#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
and it wasnt really the same situation CTS used to shove with. but its not a bad shove here.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
can someone post the cts hand?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
yes but cts is also a incredibly skilled postflop player who plays extremely well in thin spots, we dont.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] you're not cts. [/ QUOTE ] lol so???? I dunno exactly what OP is refering to, but why would it work for CTS and not OP? I mean if you have enough F/E in the shove to make up for calling and losing then its obv a good play. And like we are quite live if called... Also, for most people I do not think this is a snap call with an underpair. [/ QUOTE ] pushing turn is fine like i said. but trying to play like cts at this level is probably spew. however, betting turn is fine given stack sizes but i'd check behind if we were alot deepeer. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
looks fine to me (not sure if thats good or not tho :P)
also, y ou were begging for it with the title of this post. shouldve just said "float in rr pot picks up outs", then everyone would be like "oh...std, etc". |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
Completely opponent specific.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
villain would probably bet this turn if he had air
if he cant read hands i guess its alright |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
probably ok with your equity.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
def not sure how that ace is supposed to help your hand. he can narrow your range to like maaaaybe AJ and a set.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CTS did something like this in his video
CTS' hand went something like: raise, opponent 3bet, he make tiny tiny 4bet with 65o, cbet halfpot~ on 7AK 2 diamond flop, push for close to 2/3 pot on 8x turn.
In the hand above, does anyone like checking the turn back and then either checking behind (if we pair up), valueshove (if we spike) or bluffshove (if we miss)? |
|
|