#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
I like betting and hoping he has hit a draw much more than checking and hoping he has hit a draw.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
Didn't realize villian was unknown...need to sleep.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
If villain was Agg then I'd say check/shove. But we don't know that so if we check and villain checks we lose serious potential mulla.
Villain is either coming along for the ride or not so I'd say bet 1/2 pot and take it from there. 1/2 pot give villain opportunity to bluff. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
k. I bet $30 and villain folded.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
[ QUOTE ]
checking is so bad here. [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
i like a really weak bet of like 22ish. i think it acommplishes a few things:
1) you get called by TX, KQ, and likely 8s8/9s9 2) you get raised by any flush, and 89 3) you give the illusion of fold equity so you may induce shoves from hands like AsT, KsQ etc |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
CS3, i like it.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
I would normally bet here against an unknown, prob around 1/2 - 3/5 pot, just enough to leave him thinking he has the right implied odds for trying to make his hand and if he is not drawing lets him think he has showdown value dependent on river because of weakish bet. TBH I am probably double barrelling that board 50% of the time even with air/outside draw because it looks so strong,
Against more aggressive players i c/c / c/r turn, then either lead river or check river to induce bluff depending on opponent. I really like cs3's advice. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
bet bet bet.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: monster out of position
Standard bet 2/3s.
|
|
|