|
View Poll Results: Why aren't I the voluptuous black lady? | |||
Because I'm a douche | 31 | 26.27% | |
Because I'm stupid | 24 | 20.34% | |
Because I don't like +EV | 63 | 53.39% | |
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#311
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
Found the Greg Oden Commercial on Youtube.
|
#312
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
is there a hand history converter for AP tournement?
|
#313
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
[ QUOTE ]
Found the Greg Oden Commercial on Youtube. [/ QUOTE ] Wow I still can't stop laughing. I now know what I'll be doin' all day at work today, [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. Yugoslav |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
[ QUOTE ]
is there a hand history converter for AP tournement? [/ QUOTE ] I think POTRIPPER has one. |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
[ QUOTE ]
If prestige is the magician movie, I really liked t hat one as well and mike I think you would enjoy it.... back to complaining (before I take the day off tomorrow) My last 80 non-$100 sngs, finish distro: 6, 4, 10, 15, 6, 10, 8, 11, 3, 5 Av profit -$53, av stake $220, Av ROI -22%, Total profit -4209 Busted top set first hand of $300s today twice, once to gutshot which called psb flop and turn, other was with 66 to 69 AI on 236 flop, spade spade for his backdoor flush. $500 3 way aipf on the bubble AK, AQ, AJ (third caller) ship the river J, gg Scott. Its not like this downswing really hurts my life roll or anything, but the site/network im playing at right now doesnt have alot of higher buyins running, and when they do it is just crushing my soul to be getting smashed in them so hohrrendously [/ QUOTE ] WELLLL last night I decided to start to look for some leaks and what not, and ended up discovering that there are two different colluding 'pairs' that are in EVERY ONE of these $200+ buyin tournaments with me. I am pretty new to sharkscope, and finding this out really filled me with rage. Here is a snippit from one of my sharkscope screenshots - player on the right is a losing fish at lowstakes but is somehow cr ushing the 200+ buyins for a 52% ROI. His friend on the left is a good player on his own, but check it when hes cheating. As I mentioned e arlier, I played 80 games at $200+ on this site (they dont run often) and 66 of them have been with the players from this pic. There is also another 'cheating team' in alot of the games, although not as dramatic |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
Wow Scotty. I assume you reported this? Keep us updated.
|
#317
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
I don't see how it's possible to collude profitably in 6-max.
EDIT: I'm not denying that's a fantastic Sharkscope screen shot. I'd just be damned impressed to see how two people could successfully pay 36% of the prize pool and win when the payouts are 65/35. |
#318
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
Adderall: How awesome is it and where can I get it?
|
#319
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
[ QUOTE ]
WELLLL last night I decided to start to look for some leaks and what not, and ended up discovering that there are two different colluding 'pairs' that are in EVERY ONE of these $200+ buyin tournaments with me. I am pretty new to sharkscope, and finding this out really filled me with rage. Here is a snippit from one of my sharkscope screenshots - player on the right is a losing fish at lowstakes but is somehow cr ushing the 200+ buyins for a 52% ROI. His friend on the left is a good player on his own, but check it when hes cheating. As I mentioned e arlier, I played 80 games at $200+ on this site (they dont run often) and 66 of them have been with the players from this pic. There is also another 'cheating team' in alot of the games, although not as dramatic [/ QUOTE ] Its only 110 games. I'd need to see some suspect hands to be convinced. |
#320
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If prestige is the magician movie, I really liked t hat one as well and mike I think you would enjoy it.... back to complaining (before I take the day off tomorrow) My last 80 non-$100 sngs, finish distro: 6, 4, 10, 15, 6, 10, 8, 11, 3, 5 Av profit -$53, av stake $220, Av ROI -22%, Total profit -4209 Busted top set first hand of $300s today twice, once to gutshot which called psb flop and turn, other was with 66 to 69 AI on 236 flop, spade spade for his backdoor flush. $500 3 way aipf on the bubble AK, AQ, AJ (third caller) ship the river J, gg Scott. Its not like this downswing really hurts my life roll or anything, but the site/network im playing at right now doesnt have alot of higher buyins running, and when they do it is just crushing my soul to be getting smashed in them so hohrrendously [/ QUOTE ] WELLLL last night I decided to start to look for some leaks and what not, and ended up discovering that there are two different colluding 'pairs' that are in EVERY ONE of these $200+ buyin tournaments with me. I am pretty new to sharkscope, and finding this out really filled me with rage. Here is a snippit from one of my sharkscope screenshots - player on the right is a losing fish at lowstakes but is somehow cr ushing the 200+ buyins for a 52% ROI. His friend on the left is a good player on his own, but check it when hes cheating. As I mentioned e arlier, I played 80 games at $200+ on this site (they dont run often) and 66 of them have been with the players from this pic. There is also another 'cheating team' in alot of the games, although not as dramatic [/ QUOTE ] So 66 of the 80 games you played at the site have been with these two? Sounds like you're part of the "team". They could be colluding but the percentage of games played together isn't so high that it's definite. |
|
|