|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Question for RedBean, If steroids were illegal from 96-02, doesn't that imply that they were against the rules? [/ QUOTE ] They werent illegal anymore than morphine is illegal. [/ QUOTE ] Ummm.... your reasoning here is so bizarre. Its illegal to have a prescription drug without a valid medical reason(obv). If you have a Dr. prescribing them without a valid medical reason he stands to lose his license quickly. So yeah it would be illegal to simply be prescribed these drugs for performance enhancing benefits, hence the point I was trying to make. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
Ummm.... your reasoning here is so bizarre. Its illegal to have a prescription drug without a valid medical reason(obv). If you have a Dr. prescribing them without a valid medical reason he stands to lose his license quickly. So yeah it would be illegal to simply be prescribed these drugs for performance enhancing benefits, hence the point I was trying to make. [/ QUOTE ] What about a steroid that is not illegal, nor requires a prescription? To be quite honest, you're reasoning seems to be quite bizarre, in that you are assuming that the alleged substance was illegal by federal law at the time, and required a prescription. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ummm.... your reasoning here is so bizarre. Its illegal to have a prescription drug without a valid medical reason(obv). If you have a Dr. prescribing them without a valid medical reason he stands to lose his license quickly. So yeah it would be illegal to simply be prescribed these drugs for performance enhancing benefits, hence the point I was trying to make. [/ QUOTE ] What about a steroid that is not illegal, nor requires a prescription? To be quite honest, you're reasoning seems to be quite bizarre, in that you are assuming that the alleged substance was illegal by federal law at the time, and required a prescription. [/ QUOTE ] If you have no valid prescription for the drug it is illegal. How difficult is that? Federal law regarding control of substances has not substantially changed in the past 10 years. I have no clue why you think it has. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
If you have no valid prescription for the drug it is illegal. [/ QUOTE ] Not if the drug is not illegal. This is what we are trying to explain to you, but you are refusing to understand. [ QUOTE ] Federal law regarding control of substances has not substantially changed in the past 10 years. I have no clue why you think it has. [/ QUOTE ] Probably because I rely on facts, instead of making them up. The FDA added 'the clear' to it's list of controlled substances October 28th, 2003. Boo-yah... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
More fun with charts:
Methodology: 1. HR rate = Homeruns per 500 PA 2. Determine each players HR rate for each year (age 30 to 39.) 3. Then, divide that rate by the overall league rate for each respective year. |
|
|