#1
|
|||
|
|||
26 on FTP: AQ in sb
readless, I am really unsure of what the best line is in spots like this, I think you could make an argument for both folding, calling and rasises.
What is your std line in this spot? Full Tilt Poker, NL Hold'em Tournament, 40/80 Blinds, 9 Players LeggoPoker Hand History Converter BTN: 3,030 Hero (SB): 2,525 BB: 4,095 UTG: 3,830 UTG+1: 2,800 UTG+2: 3,160 MP1: 4,015 MP2: 1,815 CO: 1,730 Pre-Flop: (120) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) 4 folds, <font color="red">MP2 raises to 240</font>, CO calls 240, BTN folds, <font color="red">Hero ?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 26 on FTP: AQ in sb
unless MP2 is a total donk/station i think calling is going to be a lot better here. re-raising is going to leave you ~1 pot-size bet on the flop. so unless MP2 is calling this re-raise with AT sooted and such crap, call.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 26 on FTP: AQ in sb
[ QUOTE ]
unless MP2 is a total donk/station i think calling is going to be a lot better here. re-raising is going to leave you ~1 pot-size bet on the flop. so unless MP2 is calling this re-raise with AT sooted and such crap, call. [/ QUOTE ] Could have phrased that better, but I meant moving AI pf (look at their stacksizes), just raising wouldnt make any sense. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 26 on FTP: AQ in sb
you're right, i ignored their rather short stacks. however i think the same logic applies... if MP2 is calling you light here, shove. that's my view anyway
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 26 on FTP: AQ in sb
I'm not sure what exactly the math is behind a shove PF, but AQs is ahead of a lot of his range here. You have some fold equity and if he calls with 22-JJ you're flipping. The only hands that have you dominated are AA-QQ and AK which are all in his range but I think you a shove is still +EV.
|
|
|