#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
Edit: I obviously suck at posting PT screenshots. Wazfactor2 from 10/02 and 10/07. definitely not cheating |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
[ QUOTE ]
*** POCKET CARDS *** Dealt to LIVELETDIE22 [4d 2c] ANECHKA - Raises $50 to $50 CALVINHOBBES - Folds CONTIGER - Folds SPONSOR - Calls $35 LIVELETDIE22 - Folds *** FLOP *** [5d Js 2h] SPONSOR - Checks ANECHKA - Bets $25 SPONSOR - Calls $25 *** TURN *** [5d Js 2h] [3s] SPONSOR - Checks ANECHKA - Bets $50 SPONSOR - Raises $100 to $100 ANECHKA - Raises $100 to $150 SPONSOR - Calls $50 *** RIVER *** [5d Js 2h 3s] [Jh] SPONSOR - Checks ANECHKA - Bets $50 SPONSOR - Calls $50 *** SHOW DOWN *** ANECHKA - Shows [3c 3h] (Full house, threes full of jacks) SPONSOR - Mucks ANECHKA Collects $572 from main pot *** SUMMARY *** Total Pot($575) | Rake ($3) Board [5d Js 2h 3s Jh] Seat 1: CALVINHOBBES Folded on the POCKET CARDS Seat 3: CONTIGER (dealer) Folded on the POCKET CARDS Seat 4: SPONSOR (small blind) HI: [Mucked] [Kd 9c] i dunno... [/ QUOTE ] show's over, nothing to see here |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] *** POCKET CARDS *** Dealt to LIVELETDIE22 [4d 2c] ANECHKA - Raises $50 to $50 CALVINHOBBES - Folds CONTIGER - Folds SPONSOR - Calls $35 LIVELETDIE22 - Folds *** FLOP *** [5d Js 2h] SPONSOR - Checks ANECHKA - Bets $25 SPONSOR - Calls $25 *** TURN *** [5d Js 2h] [3s] SPONSOR - Checks ANECHKA - Bets $50 SPONSOR - Raises $100 to $100 ANECHKA - Raises $100 to $150 SPONSOR - Calls $50 *** RIVER *** [5d Js 2h 3s] [Jh] SPONSOR - Checks ANECHKA - Bets $50 SPONSOR - Calls $50 *** SHOW DOWN *** ANECHKA - Shows [3c 3h] (Full house, threes full of jacks) SPONSOR - Mucks ANECHKA Collects $572 from main pot *** SUMMARY *** Total Pot($575) | Rake ($3) Board [5d Js 2h 3s Jh] Seat 1: CALVINHOBBES Folded on the POCKET CARDS Seat 3: CONTIGER (dealer) Folded on the POCKET CARDS Seat 4: SPONSOR (small blind) HI: [Mucked] [Kd 9c] i dunno... [/ QUOTE ] show's over, nothing to see here [/ QUOTE ] not so fast. Couldn't this be a hand early in the session where he wants to look like a donk? Why would the show be over? EDIT: I think the evidence is in the total profits from his sessions. If they are all +, then the show is still going on. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
[ QUOTE ]
not so fast. Couldn't this be a hand early in the session where he wants to look like a donk? Why would the show be over? [/ QUOTE ] show me one hand where any of the 5 other accounts wanted to establish table image or some such crap also, VPIP 72 != VPIP 95 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
I admit that the evidence seems to lean against him being a cheater. Still, I am troubled by my personal feelings from my sessions versus him, and especially suspicious that he seemed to vanish right before GRAYCAT showed up.
Does ANYONE have a hand with him after August 20th? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
Also, when are we going to find out ALL THE ACCOUNT NAMES that AP concluded to have cheated?
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
Dan-
it really looks like you are dragging someones name through the mud with little evidence other than he owned the site for awhile. This bothers me a lot because I'm one of those players who owned AP for awhile and it seems that I could be next to be pulled into the witchhunt. If you have solid evidence against somebody than by all means expose them, but please realize that due to your high profile in this investigation you have the ability to do harm to real people and you should treat this power carefully |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
agreed adanthar, but vpip of 72 might turn into 95 if you've been getting away with it for so long. Look, you might be right on this. All I'm saying is that it can't be dismissed outright because of this one hand. In cases like this, if you assume the house is playing accounts, you have to look at complete sessions instead of individual hands. That seems fair don't you think?
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
Sponsor isnt a cheat account, I kill him all the time at 25/50 HU 08
edit- and theres no [censored] way he can see my cards |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Possibly ignored AP cheating acct: SPONSOR
ya hes lost a lot of money to me at O8 too lolz
|
|
|