|
|
#11
11-03-2007, 05:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC: Stars vs FTP
[ QUOTE ]
i have 100k fpp's on stars and i have no idea what to do with them. i wish they were cash [/ QUOTE ] If you're supernova you can get a $1,500 bonus, which converts to cash. 
|
|
#12
11-03-2007, 06:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC: Stars vs FTP
[ QUOTE ]
This shouldn't even be an argument. FTP is much softer, at least at the high buy-ins. If it weren't for supernova elite and the fact that I can't get rakeback on FTP since I signed up for my account when I was a n00b, I would definitely be playing on FTP. [/ QUOTE ] this isnt true, FTP is the same difficulty, why should it be easier?? then everybody would play at FTP, nono, Stars and FTP in SNG are same difficult, but what about ongame, i heard it is very fishy there???
|
|
#13
11-03-2007, 06:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC: Stars vs FTP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i have 100k fpp's on stars and i have no idea what to do with them. i wish they were cash [/ QUOTE ] If you're supernova you can get a $1,500 bonus, which converts to cash. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#14
11-03-2007, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC: Stars vs FTP
pokerbasti, search for sngs on ongame thread, there is a big discussion about them... In general, fishy during european peak hours but junky software and it's dead during US peak hours.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
