#1
|
|||
|
|||
Interpreting Sklansky bucks graph
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interpreting Sklansky bucks graph
It probably means you play bad because you aren't winning pots that don't go to showdown. Get more agro son.
EDIT: You know, it must be this damn PokerEV that started the W$WSF thing that Slider mentioned, because why else would people suddenly give a crap what percentage of the time they win pots postflop? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interpreting Sklansky bucks graph
Goofyballer, which PT stats should I be looking at for this? This was only 1 months sample, but most of my months have me showing skylansky bucks over net winnings. What should I be aiming at W$ESF stat? Should I try to get my flop, turn aggression up?
Thanks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interpreting Sklansky bucks graph
I don't really know, analyzing PT stats in relation to postflop play is difficult. I just know that's what a green line <<<< blue line generally means.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interpreting Sklansky bucks graph
goofy, no, it was the special channel, and I'm being 100% serious. We started looking at it a ton, and it spilled over into the main channel and just sorta spread from there.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interpreting Sklansky bucks graph
What range of W$WSF should I be aiming for?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interpreting Sklansky bucks graph
40-50 depending on what you want to accomplish, and I know thats vague, but this is poker, and we have no idea on your other stats. Sorry man, when people post these graphs all I can say is you don't play aggresively enough, but that doesn't mean I know when or where or why [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
|