|
|
|
|
#1
11-01-2007, 12:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT in reraised pot
If I put him on that range though, aren't I deep enough to set mine? When I called PF my read was that he was very strong and I needed to hit a set, maybe that is a huge leak or weak/tight, but I didn't want to risk my whole stack to find out if I was drawing to 2 outs or he had AK.
I guess when I say I had the odds, I mean that if the flop is T74 I am doubling up off a huge part of his range (JJ+) guaranteed. 
|
|
#2
11-01-2007, 01:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TT in reraised pot
[ QUOTE ]
If I put him on that range though, aren't I deep enough to set mine? When I called PF my read was that he was very strong and I needed to hit a set, maybe that is a huge leak or weak/tight, but I didn't want to risk my whole stack to find out if I was drawing to 2 outs or he had AK. I guess when I say I had the odds, I mean that if the flop is T74 I am doubling up off a huge part of his range (JJ+) guaranteed. [/ QUOTE ] yes but your hand has a lot more value than just set value unless villain is an enormous nit.
|
|
#3
11-01-2007, 01:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TT in reraised pot
90% of villains live are huge nits.
Plus I think my image is that of a calling station, and maybe if villain is thinking he will try to get max value out of me. I called a pot sized bet on the river a few hands earlier with 99 on A3455 board (villain had K3). I got a lot of wierd looks after that. I guess I just made this thread because I really wasn't sure if my fold was good or bad. I guess without reads it can never be horrible though can it?
|
|
#4
11-01-2007, 01:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TT in reraised pot
I dunno you're calling 18 to win what 262 I guess which is like 14:1 so that's not bad I suppose since you're 8:1 to hit obv - but the thing is there's a lot of times he has AK/AQ/anything else not JJ+, and you don't stack those holdings so often (and there's a lot of combos of those, and the times you get oversetted, yada yada...).
Suppose it's alright but close.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
