|
|
#12
10-30-2007, 09:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too thin? (vb\'ing 100nl)
[ QUOTE ]
against a tight player I'd suggest checking behind flop quite a bit. against this player I probably wouldn't. [/ QUOTE ] If I check flop and he leads 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] turn, is my plan to call and fold if he bets river ? 
|
|
#13
10-30-2007, 09:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too thin? (vb\'ing 100nl)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] against a tight player I'd suggest checking behind flop quite a bit. against this player I probably wouldn't. [/ QUOTE ] If I check flop and he leads 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] turn, is my plan to call and fold if he bets river ? [/ QUOTE ] It's usually pretty easy to tell whether a super loose guy is bluffy or not when you're playing him at the table. Usually agaisnt a 60VPIP guy I would autocall the turn/riv but villain looks passive so I might find a fold somewhere depending on betsize/timing.
|
|
#14
10-30-2007, 09:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too thin? (vb\'ing 100nl)
Im new to the forum, but here is my thoughts.
Only draw that got there is with 34 which is unlike holding especially with that action. Villains line is too odd for an ace and you get value from any T and even some lower PPs. River bet size is optimal IMO because you can still fold to push.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
