Stars vs Full Tilt for NL25

[Ironic]

Hello,

I am a regular at NL25 PS 6 max. I have been wondering how FT compares to Stars in terms of traffic, fishyness etc. I know it offers rakeback compared to Stars FPP system and perhaps this would help me build my bankroll faster.

Has anyone here played much on both at Nl25 and can give me their opinion?

Thanks.

[Profish2285]

I only play on FT due to the rake back, but from what I hear stars is more passive in general. I think the FT game does play more aggressively than someone would guess for NL25, but I dont have much to compare it to.

[Quester]

[ QUOTE ]
Hello,

I am a regular at NL25 PS 6 max. I have been wondering how FT compares to Stars in terms of traffic, fishyness etc. I know it offers rakeback compared to Stars FPP system and perhaps this would help me build my bankroll faster.

Has anyone here played much on both at Nl25 and can give me their opinion?

Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

IMO, they are about the same in terms of BB/100. I used to play on PS and am now on FT. Sure, you get rakeback on FT, but the games are indeed harder. It also seems like FT rakes a bit more, but I'd have to check.

Pick whichever you are comfortable with is my advice. I'd probably only choose one over the other if you are bonus chasing.

[Antinome]

I play on both and have a much easier time at FT.

Not really sure why.

[andy099]

should i be playing on party instead of full tilt?