|
View Poll Results: If you voted Rep, was your reason.... | |||
Family Values - Religion | 3 | 12.00% | |
Dem Scandals - Individ. character | 0 | 0% | |
Military - Iraq | 5 | 20.00% | |
Branding - loyalty | 0 | 0% | |
Economy - taxes | 12 | 48.00% | |
Poker | 5 | 20.00% | |
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Something I\'ve been thinking about
OK, a few questions. Lets for arguements sake say that although all these plays are 0 EV (ie, ignore pot size as well), you want to do all of them. Also assume, that he has every hand in his range with equal possibility. The question is, what 1 would you prefer, or does it make no difference....and why?
Example 1: Villain has 2 hands in his range, One you have 0% equity against, the other, you have 100% equity against. Example 2: Villain has 3 hands in his range, 2 of them have 75% equity vs your hand, 1 of them has 0% equity vs your hand Example 3: Villain has 3 hands in his range, 2 of them have 25% equity vs your hand, 1 of them has 100% equity vs your hand Example 4: Villain has 2 hands in his range, One you have 25% equity against, the other, you have 75% equity against. Example 5: Villain has 10 hands in has range. 5 Have 0% equity vs your hand and 5 have 100% equity vs your hand. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
Hand reading for our sake matters and villain having to make more difficult decisions, matters also. Perhaps lower variance also matters, but it's a little difficult to take all of this into consideration theoretically.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
the only thing i would care about here is the information i got from a call. I don't care about variance. So I can't really answer, you'de have to be alot more specific.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
Example 1= Example 5 unless i'm reading this wrong.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
[ QUOTE ]
Example 1= Example 5 unless i'm reading this wrong. [/ QUOTE ] That's what I thought too. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
i think what matters as to which of the 5 examples i want will depend very heavily on villain.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
Assuming all the pots are the same size all of these are 0 EV. I don't think I'd care.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
I'm cnfused.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
[ QUOTE ]
I'm cnfused. [/ QUOTE ] HINT: think varience |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
i strongly prefer less variance. you guys should too, because it means you can move up faster. which is highly +EV in a meta-sense. not to mention everyone tilts, even those of you who think you don't, and reducing variance reduces tilt.
if you're getting at something deeper than that, you lost us all. |
|
|