#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] BC +140 ML @ V Tech bet 1u to win 1.4u BC/V Tech u43 bet 1.02u to win 1u Air Force +6.5 @ New Mexico bet 1u to win 1u [/ QUOTE ] I'm curious, are you betting BC here because you really like them to win or is it mostly based on the small road favorite angle? [/ QUOTE ] like them to win V Tech is too one dimensional and that one dimension isn't good small road angle is for dogs of 2.5 and less |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
Cool, thanks. I was thinking 3 was included. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
GL. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
If one outta eleventy BC fumbles didn't bounce right back to them, this could be over already. Sheesh.
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
Air Force +7 1 Unit
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
[ QUOTE ]
If one outta eleventy BC fumbles didn't bounce right back to them, this could be over already. Sheesh. [/ QUOTE ] Unfukking real. VT finally fumbles and BC gets it. 4 for 4. Unreal |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
Bookmaker had Over 17 +105 for the 2nd half. That's the smallest over I think I've ever seen.
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
BC PKM (EVEN) 2nd Half 1 Unit
BC/ Va Tech Over 17 2nd Half 1 Unit |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
What do we think of U17 -105?
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If one outta eleventy BC fumbles didn't bounce right back to them, this could be over already. Sheesh. [/ QUOTE ] Unfukking real. VT finally fumbles and BC gets it. 4 for 4. Unreal [/ QUOTE ] didn't VT fumble twice early and recover their own? I mean BC is clearly running good on fumble bounces, but it's not that overwhelming. Plus, VT has the extra 4 points from a blown call. BC is running good, but not that good |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday (10/25) NCAAF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If one outta eleventy BC fumbles didn't bounce right back to them, this could be over already. Sheesh. [/ QUOTE ] Unfukking real. VT finally fumbles and BC gets it. 4 for 4. Unreal [/ QUOTE ] didn't VT fumble twice early and recover their own? I mean BC is clearly running good on fumble bounces, but it's not that overwhelming. Plus, VT has the extra 4 points from a blown call. BC is running good, but not that good [/ QUOTE ] BC also had two passes batted straight in the air that VT coulda/shoulda and the Flutie pass that shoulda been an INT. I don't remember the VT fumbles, but I did walk my dog. |
|
|