Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:07 AM
fishyak fishyak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,079
Default Re: odds question

[ QUOTE ]
Look at this page

The absence of aces might be the same problem as the absence of Kings?

[/ QUOTE ]

It is because the we have the same number of each, 4. And I think the math can be altered to search for 2 cards in a deck of 47 post flop.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:34 AM
fishyak fishyak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,079
Default Re: odds question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I get about a 57% chance that a king was dealt to one of the eight people. Here is the calculation for the odds of no one getting dealt a king:

0.434 =(1-2/47)*(1-2/46)*(1-2/45)*(1-2/44)*(1-2/43)*(1-2/42)*(1-2/41)*(1-2/40)*(1-2/39)*(1-2/38)*(1-2/37)*(1-2/37)*(1-2/36)*(1-2/35)*(1-2/34)*(1-2/33)

Have I made an error somewhere?

[/ QUOTE ]

You were correct.

1 - c(45,16)/c(47,16) = 1 - 6.46626423E11/1.503232609E12 =~ 0.57

[/ QUOTE ]

Note that this answer makes irrelevant whether you face 4 limpers or 5 limpers. What matters is the number of total cards dealt out.

To try and sum up, the above number represents a worst case scenario of the liklihood of at least one King being out against you. Decreasing the number of limpers DOES NOT DECREASE this number.

At the "non-random" level, where folds come into play, there may be some math we could use that is beyond my skill level. As the number of limpers decrease, you can fudge and lower the odds of a king still being out against you. A King could have been folded PF. But I wouldn't take much off the first #.

This work for you Count & Outer?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-24-2007, 04:54 PM
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 218
Default Re: odds question

Any calculation that includes the odds of your opponents folding a King are going to depend heavily on everyone's playing tendencies.

If you are playing in a reasonably tight aggressive game, I would expect limping hands that include Kings to be much less frequent than in a very loose passive game. TAGs don't limp many hands with Kings in them, they raise or fold them.

If your opponents are very loose and passive, though, you are going to have to expect more rag Kings to get limped.

[ QUOTE ]

At the "non-random" level, where folds come into play, there may be some math we could use that is beyond my skill level. As the number of limpers decrease, you can fudge and lower the odds of a king still being out against you. A King could have been folded PF. But I wouldn't take much off the first #.

This work for you Count & Outer?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-24-2007, 05:08 PM
TheCount212 TheCount212 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: the desert
Posts: 681
Default Re: odds question

This works fine for me, fish. Thanks very much for your diligent research and effort. Mighty neighborly of ya!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.