|
|
|
|
#1
10-23-2007, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
Both hands seems fine. Hand one is definitely standard against a lot or 200 NL regs, you're basically behind one, maybe two hands. I agree with villain that hand two is a semibluff more often than air for a reg at 200 NL.
|
|
#2
10-23-2007, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
First hand is fine.
|
|
#4
10-23-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think a SSNL nit c/r, leads with KQ or KJ there? [/ QUOTE ] Nah, I think this is 33/QJs sometimes KTs/TT/air.
|
|
#5
10-23-2007, 08:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think a SSNL nit c/r, leads with KQ or KJ there? [/ QUOTE ] Nah, I think this is 33/QJs sometimes KTs/TT/air. [/ QUOTE ] How would you play K9 in my spot?
|
|
#6
10-23-2007, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think a SSNL nit c/r, leads with KQ or KJ there? [/ QUOTE ] Nah, I think this is 33/QJs sometimes KTs/TT/air. [/ QUOTE ] How would you play K9 in my spot? [/ QUOTE ] I would fold. But that's just because I don't realise AK=K9 while playing [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] No but really, AK actually have a few percentage advantage to K9 vs the range I put him on and I'm sure he'll show up with AK/KQ/KJ a few % and having him drawing to 3 outs these times rather than having to draw to 3 outs myself has a decent impact on our equity even though these % are rather small. And I don't really think felting AK is big +ev.
|
|
#7
10-23-2007, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
Second hand, did you have any reads while playing? I'd probably play it the same way. Villain's line is pretty confusing.
|
|
#8
10-23-2007, 08:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] really? what happened to baluga theorem? the only real draw is QJ, and it would be sort of crazy to lead out with QJ after you called flop raise, he shouldn't expect you to fold AK. why would he c/r KJ on this flop? AF of 2,5 is not THAT high. I'd say that hand one is a clear fold, but you're definitely better than I, so now i dono.
|
|
#9
10-23-2007, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
hand 1 good.
hand 2, i think he rarely, if ever, checks a flush on the river. his line is weird. i think there is definitely value on the river, just dunno. i might pussy out and check but i think that shoving can definitely be viable.
|
|
#10
10-23-2007, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] really? what happened to baluga theorem? the only real draw is QJ, and it would be sort of crazy to lead out with QJ after you called flop raise, he shouldn't expect you to fold AK. why would he c/r KJ on this flop? AF of 2,5 is not THAT high. I'd say that hand one is a clear fold, but you're definitely better than I, so now i dono. [/ QUOTE ] a. This isn't Baluga b. People do bluff/semibluff and generally don't like checking the turn after check raising the flop. His range of hands that beat us here is just so narrow. He may flat 33 and possibly kt pre but that is about it. TT probably 3 bets, kk 3 bets.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
