|
|
#41
10-23-2007, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] lol you play bad [/ QUOTE ] Hmmm only two hands here are played badly. When I call with a pair of queens, and hit another on the turn - yes, my flop call totally sucks. [/ QUOTE ] Wow you only 2 hands played badly out of 6 posted damn guess you arent bad afterall 
|
|
#42
10-23-2007, 03:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
i love the blog as well as i´m pretty much the same type of sick addicted plo gambler with no life.
alas, those hands are terrible. hand 1 tells it all. @jimm: do yourself - and all of us - a favour and grind it out at plo25/50 now that you have a roll.
|
|
#44
10-23-2007, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I will bet you a $1000 dollars that you are a pathetic degenerate virgin, with little to no social life outside to blogging and browsing internet poker. Go kill yourself, but before you do that. Take that $1000 you just [censored] made. Go to the corner of the street, find a fat bitch. Pay that fat bitch some $$$. Get [censored] laid, and slit your wrists, you pathetic filth...... and stop bumping your [censored] threads [/ QUOTE ] do not agree [/ QUOTE ] WHOLEHEARTEDLY AGREE
|
|
#45
10-23-2007, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
personally i think it's the fact that he managed to pay over $200 to try and hit his draw when the pot was a grand total of $6 on the flop [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush).
|
|
#46
10-23-2007, 03:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak
|
|
#47
10-23-2007, 03:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak [/ QUOTE ] nice level .... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#48
10-23-2007, 03:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I hadn't realised stacking off with a flopped straight no redraw when you know one opponent has the same hand is good Omaha.
|
|
#49
10-23-2007, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] personally i think it's the fact that he managed to pay over $200 to try and hit his draw when the pot was a grand total of $6 on the flop [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] YEAH U STACKED THEM GOOD JIMM WHY DO PPL FELT THE NUTS WITHOUT FECKIN REDRAWS AT 1/2 WHATTA FISHES
|
|
#50
10-23-2007, 03:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I hadn't realised stacking off with a flopped straight no redraw when you know one opponent has the same hand is good Omaha. [/ QUOTE ] guess its still ok if you know that someone will call all-in with a bare flush draw, amirite? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
