NBN2 Fantasy Basketball Thread - Page 6

ClarkNasty · #51 10-22-2007, 10:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Round 2
Best - Big Al

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you guys value him way higher than I do. Am I the only one that feels as if hes gonna struggle in Min?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes

Assani Fisher · #52 10-22-2007, 10:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Round 2
Best - Big Al

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you guys value him way higher than I do. Am I the only one that feels as if hes gonna struggle in Min?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes

[/ QUOTE ]

Jefferson was the #18 overall player selected. I am willing to bet anyone that he will be less than the 18th best player under our scoring system this year according to basketball monster. You interested?

ClarkNasty · #53 10-22-2007, 11:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Round 2
Best - Big Al

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you guys value him way higher than I do. Am I the only one that feels as if hes gonna struggle in Min?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes

[/ QUOTE ]

Jefferson was the #18 overall player selected. I am willing to bet anyone that he will be less than the 18th best player under our scoring system this year according to basketball monster. You interested?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I'm not. As I've said before, value is relative on the Monster. Besides, the question you asked wasn't "is he a top 18 monster player", it was does anyone else think he will struggle in minnessota. Two different questions.

Assani Fisher · #54 10-22-2007, 11:10 PM

Obviously by "struggle" I didn't mean that he was going to turn into Kwame Brown. I just didn't think he was as good as 18th overall. What do you mean by "value is relative on Monster"?

MEbenhoe · #55 10-22-2007, 11:12 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Obviously by "struggle" I didn't mean that he was going to turn into Kwame Brown. I just didn't think he was as good as 18th overall. What do you mean by "value is relative on Monster"?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because someone is ranked 18th on Monster doesnt mean absolutely that anyone would trade you whoever happens to be ranked 40th on monster for them for example.

Assani Fisher · #56 10-22-2007, 11:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously by "struggle" I didn't mean that he was going to turn into Kwame Brown. I just didn't think he was as good as 18th overall. What do you mean by "value is relative on Monster"?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because someone is ranked 18th on Monster doesnt mean absolutely that anyone would trade you whoever happens to be ranked 40th on monster for them for example.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed. For one theres age. And for two, you have to construct your team in a certain manner(for example a lot of people might not be willing to offer fair trade value for Dwight Howard because his FT% causes you to change your team so much).

However in general, the monster rankings are a completely fair rating system, no? If not, what exactly is wrong with them?

ClarkNasty · #57 10-22-2007, 11:24 PM

[ QUOTE ]
However in general, the monster rankings are a completely fair rating system, no? If not, what exactly is wrong with them

[/ QUOTE ]

In general. Yes. But teams aren't constructed in general (well, a few super teams in the other league have been, but the vast majority don't have that luxury).

It's a good *general* barometer though, I agree.

sethypooh21 · #58 10-22-2007, 11:24 PM

BTW, in case anyone was wondering, Barbier is definitely "that guy"....

kidcolin · #59 10-23-2007, 12:54 AM

serg,

You got round 14 wrong. Theo Ratliff was worst by far. That was the biggest 'wtf' pick in my mind.

sergsz · #60 10-23-2007, 02:02 AM

[ QUOTE ]
serg,

You got round 14 wrong. Theo Ratliff was worst by far. That was the biggest 'wtf' pick in my mind.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I actually read somewhere that he is healthier than he's been in a long time, and may split time with Blount pretty evenly. Given position scarcity and Theo's shot-blocking ability, even a moderate chance that he is not completely washed up makes it a halfway decent pick IMO.