|
|
|
|
#1
10-21-2007, 04:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also, AJ was NOT a consultant. Maybe it was his technical title, but it was not the reality of the situation. That's an AP attempt to distance themselves. Make no mistake about it, AJ was running daily operations at AP. Those releases you saw earlier were sent out/approved by AJ from what I'm told. [/ QUOTE ] Any [censored] 2p2'er who gives AP OR UB business can suck my [censored] dick. We can never let up on these bitches. [/ QUOTE ] the fact that 2+2ers never play on AP would only attract 2+2ers to play on AP (over the long run). Just the truth. [/ QUOTE ] ikestoys, imo given the amount of time nat, adanthar, josem and all the other spend blowing this case and getting you your money back, the least you can do out of respect is not go back to the [censored] site [/ QUOTE ] Ass, I didn't say I was going back, but the statement above is true. I know of at least 2 2+2ers that will be heading back to AP/still playing at AP. Soft games attract sharks, period. Also, your logic is FOS... but mob rule on. |
|
#3
10-21-2007, 04:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also, AJ was NOT a consultant. Maybe it was his technical title, but it was not the reality of the situation. That's an AP attempt to distance themselves. Make no mistake about it, AJ was running daily operations at AP. Those releases you saw earlier were sent out/approved by AJ from what I'm told. [/ QUOTE ] Any [censored] 2p2'er who gives AP OR UB business can suck my [censored] dick. We can never let up on these bitches. [/ QUOTE ] the fact that 2+2ers never play on AP would only attract 2+2ers to play on AP (over the long run). Just the truth. [/ QUOTE ] ikestoys, imo given the amount of time nat, adanthar, josem and all the other spend blowing this case and getting you your money back, the least you can do out of respect is not go back to the [censored] site [/ QUOTE ] Ass, I didn't say I was going back, but the statement above is true. I know of at least 2 2+2ers that will be heading back to AP/still playing at AP. Soft games attract sharks, period. Also, your logic is FOS... but mob rule on. [/ QUOTE ] his statements makes enough sense. ppl put a ton of time and effort into you getting your money back. they would prefer that you behave in a certain way. by no means are you bound to act as they please but yes it is absolutely an issue of respect. also, the reason not to go back, from a strictly selfish pov, is that no matter how soft the games, you can never gaurantee that they are straight. if anything is learned from this situation, from ap's perspective, its that they need to cheat better. |
|
#4
10-21-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
Reminds me of when Clark Griswald tried beating the games at that one casino like Rock Paper Scissors and Pick a Number
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also, AJ was NOT a consultant. Maybe it was his technical title, but it was not the reality of the situation. That's an AP attempt to distance themselves. Make no mistake about it, AJ was running daily operations at AP. Those releases you saw earlier were sent out/approved by AJ from what I'm told. [/ QUOTE ] Any [censored] 2p2'er who gives AP OR UB business can suck my [censored] dick. We can never let up on these bitches. [/ QUOTE ] the fact that 2+2ers never play on AP would only attract 2+2ers to play on AP (over the long run). Just the truth. [/ QUOTE ] ikestoys, imo given the amount of time nat, adanthar, josem and all the other spend blowing this case and getting you your money back, the least you can do out of respect is not go back to the [censored] site [/ QUOTE ] Ass, I didn't say I was going back, but the statement above is true. I know of at least 2 2+2ers that will be heading back to AP/still playing at AP. Soft games attract sharks, period. Also, your logic is FOS... but mob rule on. [/ QUOTE ] his statements makes enough sense. ppl put a ton of time and effort into you getting your money back. they would prefer that you behave in a certain way. by no means are you bound to act as they please but yes it is absolutely an issue of respect. also, the reason not to go back, from a strictly selfish pov, is that no matter how soft the games, you can never gaurantee that they are straight. if anything is learned from this situation, from ap's perspective, its that they need to cheat better. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#5
10-21-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
I sent AP this email and uninstalled their software. Honestly I don't play enough or for high enough stakes that they will care but its the only thing I can do. I hope everyone else follows suit.
Dear Absolute Poker. Please close my account immediately and permanently. I am doing this in response to your blatant and repeated lying in regards to the fraud against players that Absolute poker was involved in. I in no way want to be associated as a customer of your site any longer. |
|
#6
10-21-2007, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
I know of at least 2 2+2ers that will be heading back to AP/still playing at AP. Soft games attract sharks, period. [/ QUOTE ] The Aboslute Poker food chain: Cheaters ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Sharks ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Fish |
|
#7
10-21-2007, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I know of at least 2 2+2ers that will be heading back to AP/still playing at AP. Soft games attract sharks, period. [/ QUOTE ] The Aboslute Poker food chain: Cheaters ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Sharks ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Fish [/ QUOTE ] lol @ ikestoys |
|
#8
10-21-2007, 04:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I know of at least 2 2+2ers that will be heading back to AP/still playing at AP. Soft games attract sharks, period. [/ QUOTE ] The Aboslute Poker food chain: Cheaters ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Sharks ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Fish [/ QUOTE ] lol @ ikestoys [/ QUOTE ] If the sharks were millionaires, what would you have against being one of them? |
|
#9
10-21-2007, 04:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
I dont get this. Am I the only one who thinks that this consultant/rogue programmer sounds reasonable. Of course it is possible that somebody (scott) has been with him.
but there is two reasons why this has been technical person: 1. Having the possibility to see opponent hole cards requires for sure a very deep technical skills. And some random manager normally doesnt have these skills. 2. Why cheater played so that cheating was so easily detectable? I can't really imagine any other reason that hacker wanted to show his skills to others. This is very common and normal hacker behaviour. So because of these reasons, this sounds true but never know. There has been so many lies. |
|
#10
10-21-2007, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
I dont get this. Am I the only one who thinks that this consultant/rogue programmer sounds reasonable. Of course it is possible that somebody (scott) has been with him. but there is two reasons why this has been technical person: 1. Having the possibility to see opponent hole cards requires for sure a very deep technical skills. And some random manager normally doesnt have these skills. 2. Why cheater played so that cheating was so easily detectable? I can't really imagine any other reason that hacker wanted to show his skills to others. This is very common and normal hacker behaviour. So because of these reasons, this sounds true but never know. There has been so many lies. [/ QUOTE ] 1: It takes a technical person to create a superuser account, not to use one. 2: Just an idiot. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
