|
View Poll Results: weed | |||
weed | 12 | 100.00% | |
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
the hand is fine if tim isnt a nit. and of course 45 man sngs are not included in this prop, thatd change the entire dynamic of the bet.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
of course 45 man sngs are not included in this prop, thatd change the entire dynamic of the bet. [/ QUOTE ]Why? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] of course 45 man sngs are not included in this prop, thatd change the entire dynamic of the bet. [/ QUOTE ]Why? [/ QUOTE ] Cuz that's not how we roll in STTF. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
in regard to the much ballyhoed hand, the hand that i described happened exactly as i wrote. so tim, i did not see the hand that you posted. in my hand, gravy made a straight and in yours he made a boat. my apologies, so i guess when you're playing every sng available on the internet, you are bound to run 8's up against 9's from time to time.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] of course 45 man sngs are not included in this prop, thatd change the entire dynamic of the bet. [/ QUOTE ]Why? [/ QUOTE ] because 5 table SNGs play differently than 1 table SNGs...45 people in a tournament create different tournament situations than 9 man tournaments. I would hope that this concept would be intuitive to most everyone thats ever put time into tournament poker. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
Not to mention that STT stands for single table tournaments. If he was going to make a prop bet involving mtts he'd post it in MTTF not STTF
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
I think of them in the same vein because they do play fairly similarly...until you get to 200/400 and still have a full table.
edit for grammar |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
I think of them in the same vein because they do play fairly similarly...until you get to 200/400 and still have a full table. edit for grammar [/ QUOTE ] do they also have a very flat payout structure? Is it easy to steal ur way into the money? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re:
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] of course 45 man sngs are not included in this prop, thatd change the entire dynamic of the bet. [/ QUOTE ]Why? [/ QUOTE ] because 5 table SNGs play differently than 1 table SNGs...45 people in a tournament create different tournament situations than 9 man tournaments. I would hope that this concept would be intuitive to most everyone thats ever put time into tournament poker. [/ QUOTE ]It's not 'intuitive' because there is no inherent advantage in playing 45 person SNGs over of 9. Is it really that egregious to interpret "25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge" as being able to play any $60 SNG tournament structure you want? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re:
[ QUOTE ]
Is it really that egregious to interpret "25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge" as being able to play any $60 SNG tournament structure you want? [/ QUOTE ] Well when it is posted on the Single Table Tournaments forum, yeah I think so. |
|
|