Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old 10-20-2007, 06:28 PM
furyshade furyshade is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,705
Default Re: The Biology of Beauty

[ QUOTE ]

They are wrong. Afaik, the accepted version almost everywhere is an interaction effect. Biological bias towards some forms of beauty adjusted by culture.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, generally things, at least for women, like narrower chins, bigger breasts (a few hundred thousand years ago buoyancy was a survival necessity), and other things we find attractive in women were at one point necessary to survival or inidicative of more estrogen/fertility. a lot of these things are vestigial and dont really apply to life anymore, but these are built in things.

some of these evolved culturally though, there was a time when fat people were attractive because that was a sign of wealth and affluence. a main difference is that evolutionary attractions stick around whereas cultural ones tend to go away as soon as they are irrelevent.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.