NL100 AK in 3bet pot like my line?

[skibbel]

I'd bet the river weak...why not?

[xeanatic]

I myself lean toward shoving the river here. Since I don't have any real reads. I think my play can be good here if I have a better read on the villain saying he's aggro and likes to bluff missed draws or weaker hands. Without reads I think this play I made loses value over the long run.

[Mike MacIntosh]

[ QUOTE ]
so you're expecting him to show up w/ QJc/JTc/T9c/QTc?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would expect villain to show up with sc's of clubs as well.

I did not fully explain myself first time around. Yes he will bluff with missed draws, I also think villain will turn some of his weak made hands into bluffs on the river given how weak our line looks. Which gives him a pretty sizeable range for shoving the river with a weak hand that would have obv. folded to a bet. I believe this makes c/c better than shoving.

[tarheeljks]

maybe i'm underestimating how often he shows up w/suited connectors here.

[xeanatic]

Ok so let's assume villian had KJ in this hand. Do you think he folded that to our rivershove? Or let's say AQ

[bubaloo]

i like the turn check as AQ will stick around and pay off on river, i dont like river check, i think a lot of hands check behind and you can get value out of most hands by shoving.

[Mike MacIntosh]

[ QUOTE ]
Ok so let's assume villian had KJ in this hand. Do you think he folded that to our rivershove? Or let's say AQ

[/ QUOTE ]

I would expect him to call a push w/ KJ more often than AQ. I really don't know what you are getting at here.

[traz]

turn check is fine, river bet is better than a check I think.