|
|
#11
10-16-2007, 09:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
Even though I probably would not push TT I think it is better than pushing AQs, as a lot of players like to just call the initial raise with AK and will have you dominated.
|
|
#12
10-16-2007, 08:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
I might just flat call here and set mine. Looks like a good spot for set mining. LAG may not call a shove PF but is likely to stack off if gets a piece of the flop.
|
|
#14
10-17-2007, 02:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
[ QUOTE ]
I might just flat call here and set mine. [/ QUOTE ] I'd shove JJ cos I think you're too much ahead to just set mine. I prefer shoving AQs and calling TT even tho TT is probly better against the calling ranges. And I kinda like the raise cos one of MP's is sometimes gonna shove Ax, 87 and other [censored]. But obv they call a shove with those sometimes too and it's not good if they just call the raise with small pairs and fold the flop.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
