#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 3 betting stealers and cont betting
I think you misunderstanding....I didnt have 1010-JJ, I wanted it to seem like I did, obv folding those hands to his double barrel is standard. But by repping 1010-JJ I got him to put in the second barrel for the exact reasons you mentioned. I was willing to play for stacks on the flop with what I was holding, so why raise flop and push out everything I beat and keep in everything I lose to? By c/c I got a second barrel out of him.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 3 betting stealers and cont betting
[ QUOTE ]
I think you misunderstanding....I didnt have 1010-JJ, I wanted it to seem like I did, obv folding those hands to his double barrel is standard. But by repping 1010-JJ I got him to put in the second barrel for the exact reasons you mentioned. I was willing to play for stacks on the flop with what I was holding, so why raise flop and push out everything I beat and keep in everything I lose to? By c/c I got a second barrel out of him. [/ QUOTE ] Ah ok, got ya. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 3 betting stealers and cont betting
edit LOL nvm
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 3 betting stealers and cont betting *DELETED*
Post deleted by brandysbich
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 3 betting stealers and cont betting
NH, btw, I misread you twice in huge pots today
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 3 betting stealers and cont betting
what was the other? I had a brutal day today...-650..vomit
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 3 betting stealers and cont betting
AA vs 99 on all under flop
|
|
|