Super System vs. Poker after Dark

[BKK Bang]

[ QUOTE ]
Also keep in mind that SS offers cash game advice and PAD is a winner-take-all tournament format.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I did, hence putting it in the original message, [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[phydaux]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also keep in mind that SS offers cash game advice and PAD is a winner-take-all tournament format.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I did, hence putting it in the original message, [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry. Most of the time other people aren't important enough to me for me to pay attention to what they say or write.

You were quoting me this time, so I read all of what you had to say.

This post is starting to not be about me anymore, so I'm losing interest again...

[Davdob]

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry. Most of the time other people aren't important enough to me for me to pay attention to what they say or write.

You were quoting me this time, so I read all of what you had to say.

This post is starting to not be about me anymore, so I'm losing interest again...

[/ QUOTE ]

This cracked me up. As a bonus whoever the original poster was will read this. I forgot his name while writing this post though.

[Farfenugen]

SS was written for cash games. Don't be obtuse.

[Farfenugen]

Ok fair enough I see where you acknowledged that. You however understate its imprtance in the difference in play. It makes all the difference.

[Masakik]

A better comparison would be High Stakes Poker to his book... Honestly though... comparing how he plays to his book.... I doubt that he'd play how he wrote... even the book itself isn't a guideline to follow "how you should play" its just info on a way you can play... Overall it takes a lot more than a book to play like doyle brunson... It takes experience, and practice which you can't get from a book. This thread is pretty pointless.

[basementproject]

Super/System was written for a different era of poker, where strategies were much less sophisticated, and much less defined. The basic foundation of what Doyle wrote is still applicable (in a TOP sense), but I would definitely never use it as a strat to model my play after in today's climate.