#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
yeah my last 60k hands at 5/10 have been 5.1ptbb playing 8-11 tables. Pretty sure if I cut down to 6 tables and played 2-4 or 3-6 6-7pt/bb per hundred would be sustainable.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
i think my last 100k hands at 5-10 my wr is like .18
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
I would be more interested in getting a poll of how many tables people play? I feel like I can keep track of how each player plays with 2 tables and thats it. If I am 3+ tables then I have to go with lines that should be optimal based on a player's PAHUD/pt stats. Comments?
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
8 tables is my maximum. but i also play on sites with [censored]/fast software.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
SO with 8 tables you make plays soley based on PTstats and regulars' images? I am not expected to notice how seat 2 on table 7 is playing right?
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
-0.2PTBB [/ QUOTE ] winna |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
SO with 8 tables you make plays soley based on PTstats and regulars' images? I am not expected to notice how seat 2 on table 7 is playing right? [/ QUOTE ] You are supposed to notice this. Maybe you wouldn't have as good of a read as you would if you were only 4-8 tabling, but you're definitely still supposed to have reads.... |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 6 [/ QUOTE ] 6 is pretty [censored] good in this day and age. Seabeast is the only person I've seen post proof of running @ 6 while multitabling over a large sample (I consider multitabling 10+ tables). I'm sure there are a couple others but they're few and far between. 4 is very solid for 12 tabling. [/ QUOTE ] 12 tabling seems like a bad idea. Also, I have 5.7ptbb over 100k hands w/n lsat 4 months. 6 is def doable [/ QUOTE ] 12 tabling is where it's @!!! No, seriously though, maybe I'm more concerned w/ my hourly than my ptbb/100, idk if that's a good thing/bad thing, whatever.... I honestly thought most everyone who was playing for a living in midstakes was playing 10+ tables. I stand corrected |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
im pretty sure i could maintain 6 at 2/4 4-6 tabling over a large sample...don't want to stay at 2/4 long enough to find out though.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I consider multitabling 10+ tables [/ QUOTE ] haha what are your thoughts on polygamy? [/ QUOTE ] Yeti - you always crack me up. I need to ninja-edit my OOT thread response to 3 2+2ers I'd like to meet IRL. |
|
|