10$ S&G: Inflection points bb vs sb

[Powers_That_Be]

agreed, they are way tigher than Nash. One thing I like to do when I look at those results is examine what 35% is. It's easy to say, "yeah, i think he'll call about 35% of the time" but when you look at what 35% of the time actually means ( calling with J9s), you realize he is rarely calling in that range. I would guess he is much closer to 25% (k9s, QJs), which would give you a significant edge.

[AMT]

the only reasons you should consider folding this are a) the bb is calling super loose or b) you have a good reason for manipulating FE by folding this hand now vs these opponents/stacks/reads etc...

[otc]

i fold pre flop

heres my take... you dont ever want to be called and be dominated... and Q3 is dominated by ATC ...

in this spot shove with Q8+

[Q..]

Easy push.
And there is definately a bug in that nash equlibrium calculator page i guess, how on earth can 65o be better then Q3 here lol?

[tigerite]

Erm, perhaps because it has less possibility to be dominated when called? There's no problem with the Nash calculator page, it's just a simple fact that 65o has a better equity against the range of the caller than Q3o!

[Q..]

Oh i see, interesting, didn't think of that this way.