100% Proof that certain Absolute players could see hole cards? - Page 2

Goadfish · #11 10-14-2007, 05:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
from that tourney....wtf was going on here?
check/folding top two v top-top? maybe he could foresee an ace on 5th?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you are mistaking PROTRIPPER and PROTR0AST. The Q9 folded preflop. JJ was what the DZ00NUTS's AQ was against... folding there is reasonable.

rhizome · #12 10-14-2007, 06:00 PM

[ QUOTE ]
folding there is reasonable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Especially when you know you only have 2 outs.

MicroBob · #13 10-14-2007, 07:25 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
from that tourney....wtf was going on here?
check/folding top two v top-top? maybe he could foresee an ace on 5th?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you are mistaking PROTRIPPER and PROTR0AST. The Q9 folded preflop. JJ was what the DZ00NUTS's AQ was against... folding there is reasonable.

[/ QUOTE ]

right. nobody folded top 2.
potripper had JJ and then folded the turn when the Q hit.

Palomino · #14 10-14-2007, 08:08 PM

People really think AP would be dumb enough to email this out after all the scandal? It seems to me that someone is trying to bring AP down and is going to great lengths to do so. In the P5s thread someone pointed out that one of the hands was edited....potrippers flop action was not shown. He didn't look closely at every hand, but the fact that any part of it was edited really makes me wonder how much of this "HH" was edited.

I'm not saying that all this stuff with AP is ok, but it really seems fishy that this HH comes out at this point in time.

jafeather · #15 10-14-2007, 08:09 PM

[ QUOTE ]
another thread for this was needed why exactly?

[/ QUOTE ]

Josem · #16 10-14-2007, 08:11 PM

[ QUOTE ]
People really think AP would be dumb enough to email this out after all the scandal?

[/ QUOTE ]

AP emailed it out before the scandal blew up.

It was received by a player who wasn't overly involved in the 2p2 community, and was massively scrambled up.

It simply takes time to recreate the hands/hhs.

[ QUOTE ]
It seems to me that someone is trying to bring AP down and is going to great lengths to do so. In the P5s thread someone pointed out that one of the hands was edited....potrippers flop action was not shown. He didn't look closely at every hand, but the fact that any part of it was edited really makes me wonder how much of this "HH" was edited.

[/ QUOTE ]

You could easily disprove the hand history by a single player from that tournament disputing their hole cards for any hand.

The data has to be edited because Absolute Poker are retards and can't email hand history files easily - they scramble up the order of the data.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not saying that all this stuff with AP is ok, but it really seems fishy that this HH comes out at this point in time.

[/ QUOTE ]
Explained above.

Palomino · #17 10-14-2007, 08:21 PM

When did the HH come out? This scandal has been going on for quite some time now. And this is the first I've seen about the HH.

Josem · #18 10-14-2007, 08:26 PM

The HH was first made publicly available yesterday.

demon102 · #19 10-14-2007, 08:50 PM

couldnt this just easily be made up? The whole hand history thing just seems to good to be true, evidence wise.

adanthar · #20 10-14-2007, 08:54 PM

[ QUOTE ]
couldnt this just easily be made up? The whole hand history thing just seems to good to be true, evidence wise.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, we personally made up a 65,536 line Excel file, full of two and a half hours of a hundred people's thousands of hand histories, including those on a dozen tables completely unrelated to the whole Potripper situation.

wait, no, no we did not