#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
[ QUOTE ]
You can run bad forever. End of story. The inverse is obviously also true. [/ QUOTE ] Seconded. Look at GW Bush. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You can run bad forever. End of story. The inverse is obviously also true. [/ QUOTE ] Seconded. Look at GW Bush. [/ QUOTE ] or sandy burglar and al bore. EN |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
Ok, technically you can run bad forever. But the statistical chance at it is so freaking low, that an extensive enough amount of hands will make the possibility negligable.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Well said and is true, but the only real part i disagree with is putting in a time period on how long you can run bad for. I have no idea how many hands you play a day/week/month, but if someone plays about 5kish hands a day it would be very difficult for them to have a downswong for a month, or more then a week or two. Multiple month downswongs for a person like that would not be by chance. But yeah the past has no effect on the future, so you can run good/bad for quite long. [/ QUOTE ] your post contradicts itself. You can run bad forever. End of story. The inverse is obviously also true. [/ QUOTE ] So some people regularly win simply because they are on a lifetime lucky streak while others (YOU, for example) regularly lose simply because they are on a lifetime losing streak that they will never "ride out?" That sounds like stinkin' thinkin' to me. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
I have recently began to see the truth of those posters that said "100k is not a lot of hands". And yes, you could run bad for a whole month and it would not be an amazingly statistcal freak. Likewise you could win over 100k and be a loser. Money in the bank is just that though and bad does not necessarily follow good - but good might not be good either.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
Im sick of people saying i am lucky. I am down more then 1500$
in all in equity. I play a ton of hands, work on my game every day, and get paid for it. Seriously im sick of OMG Rider is lucky. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
AI equity doesn't begin to tell the story of being lucky. Coolering people is much more important $ wise and is all luck.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
my first though when seeing this post was how i didnt get oversetted all in for a good 2 weeks about a month or so ago and was like hellllll yea i am the friggin man.
yesterday in 4k hands it happened 4 times. uggh. so yea, the reality check for me was that poker isnt that kind. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
i have 8 hours on full tilt today so far beginning at 8am MST and have been playing my azz off (i think anyways).
four hands out of the 700+ played so far spring to mind. KK vs. AA - stacked. AK vs. A8o - 90% stacked to a runnah-runnah 6/7 to a 8 high straight and two set's getting oversetted on the turn. mix in some inexperience on my part with cbetting the flop and folding to LP aggression and you have a recipe for a -3 BI afternoon. between respecting the tight/nitty guy who wants to get it in post flop and loosey-goosey player calling big bets with 73o, it's a straight head approach and keeping your eye's on the "long run" which see's you through the day - imo. * coolering sucks unless you're the coolee... EN |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running well, and the inevitable reality check
its interesting to think how when i first started playing poker, i ran pretty hot, and this propelled my poker "career". i wonder how many potentially really good or even great players quit in the very beginnings because they ran bad, and how many people like me "got a chance" by running hot early
|
|
|