|
|
|
|
#1
10-12-2007, 10:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
[ QUOTE ]
The EV graph is taking from a random sample of hands. I dont have the original HH files in chronological order, so I wouldnt know which one to import first to get the actual beginning of the graph. [/ QUOTE ] from hra a random sample of 10% is going to be statistically significant. Also, even if it is off a few thousand LOOK AT THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE LINES. 
|
|
#2
10-12-2007, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
[ QUOTE ]
a random sample of 10% is going to be statistically significant. Also, even if it is off a few thousand LOOK AT THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE LINES. [/ QUOTE ] Yes it can be. Just like a random 10% sample size of the chicks i have sexed in my life were 9's. That doesnt make it a [censored] true average. And once again I could care less. But until facts are proven people should shut up
|
|
#3
10-12-2007, 10:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] a random sample of 10% is going to be statistically significant. Also, even if it is off a few thousand LOOK AT THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE LINES. [/ QUOTE ] Yes it can be. Just like a random 10% sample size of the chicks i have sexed in my life were 9's. That doesnt make it a [censored] true average. And once again I could care less. But until facts are proven people should shut up [/ QUOTE ] sample size determines margin of error 140,000>>>>>>>>>>1 girl you got a handjob from in highschool
|
|
#4
10-12-2007, 10:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
good one
|
|
#5
10-12-2007, 10:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] a random sample of 10% is going to be statistically significant. Also, even if it is off a few thousand LOOK AT THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE LINES. [/ QUOTE ] Yes it can be. Just like a random 10% sample size of the chicks i have sexed in my life were 9's. That doesnt make it a [censored] true average. And once again I could care less. But until facts are proven people should shut up [/ QUOTE ] sample size determines margin of error 140,000>>>>>>>>>>1 girl you got a handjob from in highschool [/ QUOTE ] This is correct.
|
|
#6
10-12-2007, 10:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] a random sample of 10% is going to be statistically significant. Also, even if it is off a few thousand LOOK AT THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE LINES. [/ QUOTE ] Yes it can be. Just like a random 10% sample size of the chicks i have sexed in my life were 9's. That doesnt make it a [censored] true average. And once again I could care less. But until facts are proven people should shut up [/ QUOTE ] sample size determines margin of error 140,000>>>>>>>>>>1 girl you got a handjob from in highschool [/ QUOTE ] This is correct. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Yeah well your the one with the margin.....
|
|
#8
10-12-2007, 11:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
[ QUOTE ]
With this many hands a 10% random sample should be very close to actual. [/ QUOTE ] if this is true, and he is down around $2k in allin luck over this sample does that mean he could be >$20k below expectation in allin luck over the entire sample?
|
|
#9
10-12-2007, 11:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH
Am I missing something or does that EV graph not confirm that fgators is a huge nit who folds too much and doesn't bluff ever and so while he might be a slight winner pre-rake he's a loser after rake?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
