#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL Playing 1010 OOP *DELETED*
[ QUOTE ]
why would you delete such an elegant post? [/ QUOTE ] Because I'm pretty sure I did the math wrong in this one. The JJ post is similar, but I double checked the math in that one and it turned out to be OK. I'm too tired and I'm going to bed, so instead of redoing the math in this one, I just deleted it. Basically, this kind of question is strictly a math problem. The only "skill" involved is in putting villain on a range of hands with which he will reraise your short-stack raise and then call your push (if you make one). Once you have a range, you just use Excel and PokerStove to get the answer. Since the range is player and situation dependent, you really need some reads and/or reliable statistics over 500+ hands with villain. "No read" and "over 29 hands" just isn't much to go on. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL Playing 1010 OOP
[ QUOTE ]
I couldnt. Lost a decent pot on previous hand and didnt reload in time. [/ QUOTE ] you are not honest...my blind Christian grandmother could shortstack better than u. the quickest way to dramatically improve your win rate would be to start playing online blackjack. |
|
|