|
|
#11
10-11-2007, 04:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 25 - Flopped trips, deep-stacked, line check
Nice suckout. Looks fine.
|
|
#12
10-11-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 25 - Flopped trips, deep-stacked, line check
well played.
trips = good. kicker = bad. A call on that flop means a flush draw or big pair (or bigger A than yours). Looks like you are either WA/WB on the flop. So I like the turn check/call to keep the pot small. The river was pretty standard...value bet & call the raise (& push if you have anything else left).
|
|
#14
10-11-2007, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 25 - Flopped trips, deep-stacked, line check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have to ask... do you think he's ever doing this without an ace? Cause if not, then you're ahead of 4 hands on the flop and 3 hands on the turn. If you think he's got an ace here, calling down is bad. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. At micro limits I seem to find that continued aggression from average villain against a paired board means "I can beat your trips." This deep, out of position, calling down is going to pay off better hands and not get value from worse hands. Question: Assuming that you didn't spike a 7 on the river, what is your plan? [/ QUOTE ] I don't see how I can fold here. If he has 33, I have 6 outs that will certainly stack him, and 1 out which he might get away from (he may or may not get stacked on a AAA3x board). If the guy has an ace, I'm either ahead of him (A4,A5,A6), tied (A7), or behind, but with 6 outs to a chop or 3 outs to a suckout (A2,A3,A8+). It's also possible the guy has a flush draw or pocket pair, in which case I'm way ahead. I was going to check/call the river if it wasn't a 2, 3, 7, or A.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
