#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 200NL: AK reraised pot vs. nit
[ QUOTE ]
those saying call, cc river, its such bad advice. try to think about it in a longterm and understand why paying off is soooo bad versus a nit here. nits will check behind AQ, so now we're against a set or a pp that is bluffing. now consider how often a nit will not show the goods in these spots, and consider how that factors into your metagame when you're making these dumb payoffs. ofc u show "but if i fold, he will always bluff me here". BUT HE'S A NIT. he doesnt ever have enough hands in his range to make them into bluffs anyways. ppl then turn this into an excuse of "he's gotta NOT HAVE it eventually!". WRONGGGGG. [/ QUOTE ] You conveniently left out AK |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 200NL: AK reraised pot vs. nit
i didnt read the above replies but i saw this post and somehow read it as:
[ QUOTE ] those saying call, cc river, its such bad advice. try to think about it in a longterm and understand why paying off is soooo bad versus a nit here. nits will check behind AQ, so now we're against a set or a pp that is bluffing. now consider how often a nit will not show the goods in these spots, and consider how that FGators into your metagame when you're making these dumb payoffs. ofc u show "but if i fold, he will always bluff me here". BUT HE'S A NIT. he doesnt ever have enough hands in his range to make them into bluffs anyways. ppl then turn this into an excuse of "he's gotta NOT HAVE it eventually!". WRONGGGGG. [/ QUOTE ] ..but somehow it still made perfect sense |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 200NL: AK reraised pot vs. nit
Those saying c/c are probably ignoring bet sizes. If he bets 3/4 pot on turn, then shoves turn its a call. Nits don't 1/2 pot 3 streets in a row as a bluff ever, or with worse for value.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 200NL: AK reraised pot vs. nit
Also, seriously how embarrassing is it to have TeddyKGB the maniac as your screen name, yet you are the biggest vagina ever.
|
|
|