capped correctly on preflop w AQs? call on river?

[maverickai]

[ QUOTE ]
Really? Is 60:40 "so far" behind?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where did you get this nos? Stove? and what's the hand range you gave for villian?

[bellatrix]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why did you 3-bet turn? You are extracting no value as there are only 2 players left. Given the raise/cap, you are so far behind it's not funny.
That's where the spew lies...

[/ QUOTE ]

you meant 3-bet the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, duh me!

[Sushiglutton]

I don't like the cap pf. You raised from EP and he 3-bets so I doubt ur hand beats his range. Since he seems laggy post-flop you won't create any fold equity by capping, so I just call.

I don't like flop. You don't have equity after he raises and this line won't make him fold AK. So just call the raise.

On this level I don't think you will make opps fold enough to make an aggro move on the turn. So call is fine. His high AF may mean he is aggro AND he folds a lot. This is the perfect opp to make a turn CR (because he will often have AK and is capable of folding it), but I think it's too fancy here. Also since you built the pot on the flop it's impossible.

And I c/f river the way this hand was played.

[Sushiglutton]

[ QUOTE ]
I would probably have bet the flop with your flush draw(...)quote]

What are you hoping to achieve with this?

[Fantam]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would probably have bet the flop with your flush draw...

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you hoping to achieve with this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Looking at this hand again, I think the converter seems to have made the pots too big.

Anyway, villain seemed to be pretty agressive from his limited stats.

The pot should have been about 7.5 sb on the flop after calling his pf 3-bet.

With 2 decent overcards and the flush draw, I thought that a flop bet might have had some fold equity and been for value.

[nightwood]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Really? Is 60:40 "so far" behind?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where did you get this nos? Stove? and what's the hand range you gave for villian?

[/ QUOTE ]

When we give villain JJ+ we're 42,5% dogs on the flop.

[Xylocain]

:g:

just wow

[Reaction]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Really? Is 60:40 "so far" behind?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where did you get this nos? Stove? and what's the hand range you gave for villian?

[/ QUOTE ]

When we give villain JJ+ we're 42,5% dogs on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

You could probably give villain a tight range and still not be more than a 3:2 dog. Conversely, this played out a bit differently could put you a slight fave(like 49:51).

Point is HU to a low dry flop with O.C. and flush draw (or not) comes up frequently enough that prior thought is important. You can then adapt on the fly to variables of being IP, OOP, against different player types and hand ranges (i.e. if you were IP and just Iso 3-Bet a sLA that did not cap).

My original question aimed at what OP considers WB in HU. I had thought that a difference closer to 50% in EQ is dire and anywhere in the 10-30% range is in good shape though behind.