*** OFFICIAL 10/07/07 NFL SNF GAME THREAD (CHI @ GB) ***

[rsigley]

bears +2.5 1H even

[NajdorfDefense]

2u on GB-3/-120
6-2-1 ATS, 0-3ml, +3.1u, props -1.7u

[NajdorfDefense]

[ QUOTE ]
2u on GB-3/-120
6-2-1 ATS, 0-3ml, +3.1u, props -1.7u

[/ QUOTE ]

TY SFO and Car from BSP thread. 8-2-1 ats, +5.1u.

go pack go. SIA has Chi +3.5/+105 if you want the bears.

[MyTurn2Raise]

picked and posted it earlier in the day [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Bears +3.5 v Packers bet 1.05u to win 1u

part of the Inimical NFL Algorithm Spotting Systematic Addle-pates

6-5-1
up 0.62u
bet 12.90u

[NajdorfDefense]

GB can't run the ball, all the BSPs tell me so.

Dvoracek
Brown
Payne S out

J. Tait T Doubtful Ankle
N. Vasher CB Doubtful Groin
L. Briggs LB Questionable Hamstring
A. Peterson RB Questionable Calf
C. Tillman CB Questionable Ankle
A. Archuleta S Probable Hand
R. Brown G Probable Shoulder
T. Harris DT Probable Knee

This is not last year's team no matter who QB is. No TJones either.

[thelyingthief]

how do YOU spell f-i-x ?

[zer0]

[ QUOTE ]
how do YOU spell f-i-x ?

[/ QUOTE ]

someone knew something

[thelyingthief]

pro football is woefully corrupt. between the jones type players and the pass interference calls, it's belly up.

they should compel referees to take lie detector tests.

but then, that's 60 billion in bets jeopardized, isn't it?

[Alzee]

what a joke

[thelyingthief]

for the record, lest it seem i cry over spilt milk:

[ QUOTE ]
i hear all the reasons for betting GB at -3, and for the life of me cannot find any reason to bet on the bears; except for one thing. it seems to me, this is a line one needs to examine from a different point of view:

WHY IS THIS LINE SO LOW??? pardon me, but my nose is interfering with my greed here.

take the bears :^/

tlt

[/ QUOTE ]

i had the bears teased with tennesee, 1U.

however, two fumbles by the same player in the first quarter, both resulting from incidental contact, the interception by favre, the subsequent 3 and out, etc., the proliferation of infractions (not in this game so much as the so-called "upsets" last week in the college game) which replay reveals as nonexistent..i don't know, i cannot avoid the suspicion that it's all sham.

tlt