#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
so did you call ?
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
thread title lead me to believe this would be a tough decision but this seems surprisingly easy
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's almost impossible that he is bad enough to value shove the jack of diamonds here. I mean come on lol. [/ QUOTE ] Umm, a shove with the Jd would obv not be for value. [/ QUOTE ] Right. Unless villain is impossibly bad. It would be a bluff and [ QUOTE ] Villain is a nit and isn't bluffing for four buy ins here. [/ QUOTE ] |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
Even though he's passive nit, I can't believe that a passive nit can just flatcall JTs on the turn...
I mean... WTF? Maybe on the heat of the multitabling he misread his A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] for A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] or just misclicked ^_______^ Or looked that he had A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] on other table, but ended shoving it on this table... As played I'd fold though. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
Smooth calling turn with JTdd would be bad, but from his river action, it appears villain did indeed make that play. Since when do you assume that nits play optimally postflop?
[/THREAD].....! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
maybe just call the river raise?
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
[ QUOTE ]
maybe just call the river raise? [/ QUOTE ] this HAS to be a level right? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
ya I agree. nothing we beat should be calling a 3bet.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
nah it isnt
what do you expect this guy to be raise/calling here? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
lol JTdd only in fact given that we have the ace of diamonds
|
|
|