#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
Villain is 24/4/.4/60
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) SB ($21.95) BB ($4.50) Hero ($60.35) MP ($30.80) CO ($18) Button ($25.65) Preflop: Hero is UTG with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $1</font>, MP calls $1, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>. Flop: ($2.35) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $1.5</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises to $3.5</font>, Hero calls $2. Turn: ($9.35) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP bets $8</font>, Hero folds. Final Pot: $9.35 Is this ok? Should I b/f the turn instead? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
With his aggro factor this is fine.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
What did the turn change? Either fold flop or push turn. 95% just fold flop.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
without any specific history between you, i would be tempted to fold the flop as it is super dry.
turn looks good. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
No specific history at that point, other than I had been c-betting a lot and thought villain could be making a stand with a worse queen. Figured since he was passive I could re-evaluate on the turn.
Anyway I figured this was ok, just wanted a sanity check. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
Everyone folds far too much around here
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
[ QUOTE ]
Everyone folds far too much around here [/ QUOTE ] Then perhaps explain why you would make a case for calling/raising... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
Trying to do some hand-reading, he either has an overpair (not likely due to pre-flop, but maybe) (9 combos), a set (7 combos) or two-pair (8 combos of Q9, 93 is ignored). He's not likely to raise an OESD draw.
If he'll raise the flop with KQ (8 combos) and then check the turn, that's 8 combos you're ahead vs. 24 combos you're behind, or about 1:3, and you're getting 2:7.35 pot odds. But you've got a lot of reverse implied odds if you happen to improve that would tempt you to keep calling, so it might be best to just fold the flop. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25 - AQ flops TPTK, faces resistance from a passive player
[ QUOTE ]
Trying to do some hand-reading, he either has an overpair (not likely due to pre-flop, but maybe) (9 combos), a set (7 combos) or two-pair (8 combos of Q9, 93 is ignored). He's not likely to raise an OESD draw. If he'll raise the flop with KQ (8 combos) and then check the turn, that's 8 combos you're ahead vs. 24 combos you're behind, or about 1:3, and you're getting 2:7.35 pot odds. But you've got a lot of reverse implied odds if you happen to improve that would tempt you to keep calling, so it might be best to just fold the flop. [/ QUOTE ] I actually think a lot of passive players play KK+ like this, which after the turn is basically what I had him on (I think a set bets less on the turn, but maybe not). In retrospect, I probably could have folded the flop, but it just seemed like a super-weak move. |
|
|