#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
not really, you have to bet at some point and this flop is getting checked through 80% of the time. I do it alot to balance my range from when i bet/3bet with 79hh here. [/ QUOTE ] Everyone b3b all in with 97hh here in BvB. That doesn't balance much at all. I'd probably just shove preflop. Good FE against pairs and AQ will call more than you think. Hell, people are retards are BvB, I wouldn't be shocked if AJs called. Esp if you have any BvB history with anyone. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
lol at thinking a nit will call with AJ here.
4bet preflop here is pretty bad against a 7/7. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
betting this flop is nuts obv check
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
if it doesnt balance much observant opponents can instacall with JJ.
with history, i like to shove pf here too. hate when people feel they can mess with my blind steal. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
if you check and call a bet on this flop, whats your hand gonna look like to the nit, whos probably already putting you on AAA. If you check you gain that c-bet he might or might not make. If you bet, he might remember something from an old CR video that you should always raise donkbets. or something else, that will make you more money than checking the flop.
and yeah, no 4bet vs this guy. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
call pre flop.
does anyone like check raising the flop? If you just call the flop and he doesn't have an A, it's probably getting checked through on the turn, imo. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] not really, you have to bet at some point and this flop is getting checked through 80% of the time. I do it alot to balance my range from when i bet/3bet with 79hh here. [/ QUOTE ] Everyone b3b all in with 97hh here in BvB. That doesn't balance much at all. I'd probably just shove preflop. Good FE against pairs and AQ will call more than you think. Hell, people are retards are BvB, I wouldn't be shocked if AJs called. Esp if you have any BvB history with anyone. [/ QUOTE ] lol @ b3b 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] vs. this villain on this flop because of "balancing". Balancing/meta is irrelevant. The dude is 7/7. He simply hates this flop mosts of the time because his range is mostly pairs now. If he raises a lead here, he always has AQ or better. WTF does balancing have to do with anything if villain is NEVER folding when he raises? HE IS 7/7. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
Call pre, donk flop, c/r turn, lead river if turn gets checked through
This line almost always gets 2 streets of value out of KK, QQ (as opposed to sometimes getting two streets with check/bet/bet) and still stacks AQ and frerolls AK. Also I've been 7/7/0 over 50 hands before, people do go card dead. Now this guy is most likely a nit, but almost certainly not as nitty as he looks. AQ is prob in his range here. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
I missed villain is 7/7, but that's ridiculous that people are thinking a 7/7 over 50 hands is a nit. I've played 7/7 over 50 hands plenty of times and I'm definitely not a hit. 7/7 over 50 only lets you know that he's PROBABLY some kind of aggressive player.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs Nit NL 100
Call preflop vs. nit.
Flop, whatever. I might bet, I might check/call, I might check/raise. Just gotta go with whatever reads/instincts you have at the table. |
|
|