|
|
#11
06-29-2007, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 Bunch of people call my 3-bet
I think this is okay. I would get it in vs. BB, but if anyone calls comes along I'm shutting down immediately.
BB buys in for $600 then cold calls a raise and a 3 bet for 1/4 of his stack, I'm giving him 0 credit. CO should have a fairly wide isolating range vs. the open limper, and by the time the action gets back to him he's probably calling any two he opened with. I'm most worried about MP (wtf does a TAG limp/cold call a 3 bet with?), but it's hard to put anybody on anything given the action. You might have the best hand and a bet will give you info/protect what might be the best hand in a huge pot. I don't think checking is horrible, but I think most people are assigning too tight of ranges to these guys who are probably idiots, and whose line makes no sense no matter what they have. 
|
|
#14
06-30-2007, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 Bunch of people call my 3-bet
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is okay. I would get it in vs. BB, but if anyone calls comes along I'm shutting down immediately. BB buys in for $600 then cold calls a raise and a 3 bet for 1/4 of his stack, I'm giving him 0 credit. CO should have a fairly wide isolating range vs. the open limper, and by the time the action gets back to him he's probably calling any two he opened with. I'm most worried about MP (wtf does a TAG limp/cold call a 3 bet with?), but it's hard to put anybody on anything given the action. You might have the best hand and a bet will give you info/protect what might be the best hand in a huge pot. I don't think checking is horrible, but I think most people are assigning too tight of ranges to these guys who are probably idiots, and whose line makes no sense no matter what they have. [/ QUOTE ] That was my reasoning as well. Results: They all folded. Thanks for feedback everyone.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
