*** OFFICIAL 9/30/07 NFL SNF GAME THREAD (PHI @ NYG) ***

[brendanb438]

Olay you are a degenerate gambler that will go broke over and over with your wonderful skills at betting your whole roll. The Eagles had an amazing week last week with Westy rocking it out.

Not gonna argue you are a square as usual. When you actually make good plays and have good input you then donk it all off on a couple huge plays. Continue with that line of thought and play bro.

I like the under in what should be a solid defensive showing in a division rivalry game. Kevin Curtis isn't gonna get 3 more TDs this game son. Buckhalter isn't gonna carry the Eagles either.

[brendanb438]

Yeah because sharps across the net who feel that the Eagles on the road, against a division rival, without their star player (Westbrook for you trolls out there) are in a great position to be laying points. 63% of the public is on Philly from what I have also read. So enjoy backing the away team laying points on a Sunday night. They are well known to win these games yup.

Let me add Water your post of
EAGLESSSSSSSSSS -2.5 BIG...no MONSTEROUS

Was very informative and adds as usual alot to the thread.

[WaterOlay]

[ QUOTE ]
Olay you are a degenerate gambler that will go broke over and over with your wonderful skills at betting your whole roll. The Eagles had an amazing week last week with Westy rocking it out.

Not gonna argue you are a square as usual. When you actually make good plays and have good input you then donk it all off on a couple huge plays. Continue with that line of thought and play bro.

I like the under in what should be a solid defensive showing in a division rivalry game. Kevin Curtis isn't gonna get 3 more TDs this game son. Buckhalter isn't gonna carry the Eagles either.

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree the under isnt a bad play.

with that said... u can look at my previous posts and see my losses....

WITH THAT SAID... you can look at you and naj's previous posts and see how you seem to win when u "MIGHT" have a play... but someone claim to not have a play when it loses. im done with this thread and done with this site

[WaterOlay]

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah because sharps across the net who feel that the Eagles on the road, against a division rival, without their star player (Westbrook for you trolls out there) are in a great position to be laying points. 63% of the public is on Philly from what I have also read. So enjoy backing the away team laying points on a Sunday night. They are well known to win these games yup.

Let me add Water your post of
EAGLESSSSSSSSSS -2.5 BIG...no MONSTEROUS

Was very informative and adds as usual alot to the thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol.. yea ok man squares on eagles at 63%, meanwhile i have 63% of ppl are on giants ML. oh yes, let me guess all of those are the sharps.

Giants might win this game, they might not. To say all the value is out is absurd. My money is on the eagles.

[WaterOlay]

and with that, i have asked for a ban from this site. good [censored] luck idiots.

to alot of you... you are pretty good...
bills, ncaaf
mt2r, iggy never lie
ric doing it the ppl
and whoever else out there who doesnt

most of the regulars are trolls.. and yes this should be stickied.

i will never check this forum again.. good luck idiots

[rush66]

WO,

In this case is probably is sharps. Because to squares -2.5 is essentially a win, so they figure why screw with the larger ML. Just take the spread. Thats what I think atleast. Squares are less likely to take a dog ML in this case.

[ur54sold]

Giants ML

[NajdorfDefense]

McNabb o21.5 completions -115 to win 1.5u

[theclock]

I took the over. With Westbrook out, it's doesn't look so good. :-(

[ur54sold]

roughing kicker