|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Deep vs. Huge Fish I had an Overpair.
[ QUOTE ]
i bet here, 1/2 pot ish is probably about right. dunno what you c/cers are expecting him to suddenly turn into a bluff on the river [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] My experience with this type of player is that they will just autobet the river with mediocre hands with showdown value. Dont think theres much value in betting this river, bad players just go: zomg ace my hand cant be any good now! This doesnt make much sense for a thinking player but a lot of fish think exactly like this. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Deep vs. Huge Fish I had an Overpair.
i dont think that a 70/30 is a) adjusting or b) knows what showdown value even means. I would c/c and expect him to think you cant possibly have a good hand every time he bluffs and decide to do it again.
edit: another reason i c/c is because he prob wont pay off w/ too many hands here since he doesnt beat AK anymore |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Deep vs. Huge Fish I had an Overpair.
I think if villan is more stationy/passive we should bet like $300. We'll still get a call from 77 and other [censored] that he might have checked behind.
If he's more bluffy (ie. peels multiple streets with like QJ or whatever), I would check. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Deep vs. Huge Fish I had an Overpair.
[ QUOTE ]
Lots of hands I would have sets or TP or OPs and bet three streets and he would call two barrels and fold the third. As well lots of times I would c/c and snap off his big bluffs [/ QUOTE ] is what makes it a c/c for me |
|
|