BRAG: My aces are holding up.

Daliman · #1 09-30-2007, 02:33 AM

Since 9/19, I have had AA 67 times, and haven't lost a single time with it.

BEAT: Regression to mean is gonna suck.
VARIANCE: Hopefully, this is regression to mean for losing $2400 with AA for the month of September 2006.

Also, anyone happen to know their longest streak winning with AA? I imagine this is mine.

H2Flow · #2 09-30-2007, 02:59 AM

I'm nowhere close to 67 times straight. I'd say somewhere in the range of 25-30 max if that, and that was a while back when I was starting out...I was one of those clowns that would play them to a showdown no matter what.

BEAT: Who am I kidding, I'm still one of those clowns lol.

schundler · #3 09-30-2007, 03:05 AM

CrazyJoe113 · #4 09-30-2007, 03:06 AM

beat: if you havent lost w/ AA the last 67 times, you are prob. misplaying it

JEFF or DAD · #5 09-30-2007, 03:06 AM

BEST DALIMAN THREAD EVER?? I THINK SO

goofyballer · #6 09-30-2007, 03:22 AM

I'm at 22 in a row right now, WILL I CHALLENGE DALIMAN'S SUPREMACY?!?!?!?! Stay tuned to find out!

...it'll take me like a month to get dealt AA 40 more times though so this could take awhile.

KSOT · #7 09-30-2007, 03:23 AM

67 times in a row literally seems impossible to me. You run well.

Daliman · #8 09-30-2007, 03:50 AM

[ QUOTE ]
beat: if you havent lost w/ AA the last 67 times, you are prob. misplaying it

[/ QUOTE ]
Please elaborate, as I fear you don't know wtf yer talking about.

I'm not open-shoving or RRAI'ing them from full stacks, so how else can I be misplaying them to WIN 67 times in a row?

SNOWBALL · #9 09-30-2007, 04:11 AM

[x]Misusing regression to the mean

Micro Donk · #10 09-30-2007, 04:40 AM

ive lost 1 time with AA in 78 of them...(2 were net losses though, but im not counting the AA = AA split)

beat: the loss was AA < KK AIPF

variance: i win the blinds a lot with it