|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
Ur not that deep - and ur giving him the chance to hit a flop that he may go with. I"d just reraise pre.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
just to be clear, betting the flop in a spot like this was part of my preflop plan, so I'm asking about the preflop plan rather than the flop
the basic idea here is that calling his fourbet looks really scary and he should expect me to have a relatively big pocket pair that I'm going to jam on a safe flop, so on flops like this he has to just give up if he was on a bluff. I forgot to mention this but he fourbet very quickly which I thought meant he didn't have a borderline type of hand like QQ or JJ, I figured either AA/KK or something he was getting frisky with (including AK I guess) this leads to the next point which is that if he's on air and I flop a pair he might try to represent my hand because he doesn't think AK is in my range to flatcall here... so basically I'm hoping that I can get him to play his hand completely backwards (bluffing when I hit and giving up when I miss). And if he really has a big hand then I can get away on the flop for kind of cheap. this is just something I've toyed around with a little bit against threebets since no one expects an Axx or Kxx flop to hit you when you've just called them... so you can get people to stack off light because it looks like you're just making a move eh, I'm kinda rambling now |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
I like your thinking and like all streets
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
I like your thinking and like all streets [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, baluga does have a point though. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
by the way, "its full ring" doesnt really matter when everyone folds to blind v blind. obviously the overall game dynamic is altered, but in this situation it shouldn't be much different than if it were 3-handed.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
by the way, "its full ring" doesnt really matter when everyone folds to blind v blind. obviously the overall game dynamic is altered, but in this situation it shouldn't be much different than if it were 3-handed. [/ QUOTE ] this is true (which is what I said in my OP) but full ring does attract different types of players and not all of them are as experienced in blind attacking/defense situations... given the limited info I had on this guy it was hard for me to know how well he would adjust. The stronger FR TAGs play out these spots very aggressively but there are also a lot of them that don't fight back nearly enough. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
it would be neato if you intended to call a push
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
soah,
while that's a great thought, your flat call still looks like AA/KK. AK hits the same flops those hands do, so the deception factor just isn't high enough to justify trying to mix it up with that hand. Just 5 bet like the rest of us. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
if i had a huge hand here and i was him, this is what i'd do.
reraising pf better obv. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick checkup - AK blind battle vs probable 2p2er
Full-ring TAG regulars are so much nittier in general - especially preflop. I've been playing some FR recently and the average TAG's range here is so heavily weighted with AK KK AA.
If he's 2+2 he's going to probably c/f AK if he misses and you can steal. And if he has KK,AA you dont get stacked unless you hit tptk. And you also get to snap off occassional air. |
|
|