|
View Poll Results: My best response: | |||
"Jason, what I meant is that given that picture of you, and the cuteness of your baby, your wife must be very attractive, because it had to come from somewhere. Sorry for the confusion." | 9 | 50.00% | |
"Yeah, what can I say, I'm into redheads." | 9 | 50.00% | |
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
that poll is biased i cannot vote
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
Forum downgrade [/ QUOTE ] |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
If I'm lurking into a new forum I usually sort by viewcount because those are sometimes the best threads -> usually means the thread has been linked to from other places.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
I think we should change it to >25.
Thread is worthless until it's been viewed at least 25 times. After that it doesn't matter. Everyone knows this. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
ericw obv did this
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
Change view count to Roman numerals?
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
Change view count to tally marks [/ QUOTE ] I agree, if you used a thread count view to decide if you should read it, you shouldnt read it. Get rid of column. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
Sniper is going to be upset. His usefulness to the forums has slipped a notch. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
Folks,
As I'm sure at least some of you have surmised, the reason for the (maybe temporary change) is that some of our users have decided that large view counts, even if artificially created, are a good thing. Unfortunately twice in the last 3 weeks this has increased the load on the forums to the point where they become unusable. This wastes all of our time. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
Statistical nittery: Simple regression results are iffy here because you clearly don't have constant variance. [/ QUOTE ] Heteroskedasticity FTW! |
|
|