![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
very solid brag.
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WTF site is this on??
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
20/11/1.5 WTF???????????????????????????
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Imsakidd: I'm not saying it isn't a good brag in making money, I'm saying this guy is the opposite of special. You see his location saying Sweden? You know, there are swedish forums, and thus I know this guy, and yes, he is the biggest nit ever, playing on very soft sites, it's really nothing that impresses me about this except for his stamina to put in hands. He would get killed on tougher sites. Even so, congratulations on your results of course, I'm really not taking that away from you, I'm just trying to explain that these thats are really, really non even close to optimal, and that you are winning from really bad players, not from decent players. Got it? [/ QUOTE ] Ban. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
![]() ![]() ![]() [/ QUOTE ] Are these your stats? Don't you play 1/2? |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fake? or like an absolute player who's smarter than the other superaccount player
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesssh, vn.
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
prima i guess? which other sites have 2.5/5 and 4/8?
anyways people calling him a nit are stupid. its better to play a low variance style even if its not 100% optimal because the emotional stress caused by high variance play will result in a lower longterm winrate. |
![]() |
|
|