400k hand graph

[Pokamastah]

[ QUOTE ]
fake?

[/ QUOTE ]

They are my stats 95k hands ago, he got them from a thread on another site.

Here's my current stats, don't know why they disappeared in my previous post.

[Louis Vuitton]

Yesssh, vn.

[sdfsdf]

prima i guess? which other sites have 2.5/5 and 4/8?
anyways people calling him a nit are stupid. its better to play a low variance style even if its not 100% optimal because the emotional stress caused by high variance play will result in a lower longterm winrate.

[bottomset]

[ QUOTE ]
prima i guess? which other sites have 2.5/5 and 4/8?
anyways people calling him a nit are stupid. its better to play a low variance style even if its not 100% optimal because the emotional stress caused by high variance play will result in a lower longterm winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]

fulltilt has 4/8(deep)

[GSykes]

he plays on hat super fishy sweden site swedish svend or w/e it is

[sdfsdf]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
prima i guess? which other sites have 2.5/5 and 4/8?
anyways people calling him a nit are stupid. its better to play a low variance style even if its not 100% optimal because the emotional stress caused by high variance play will result in a lower longterm winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]

fulltilt has 4/8(deep)

[/ QUOTE ]
nobody plays though

[keikiwai]

20/10/1.5 is the new 24/20/3.5

[Renton]

please please PLEASE

tell me how you lose so [censored] little from the blinds

[coordi]

This cant be real.

[frogstomp]

[ QUOTE ]
Imsakidd: I'm not saying it isn't a good brag in making money, I'm saying this guy is the opposite of special.

You see his location saying Sweden? You know, there are swedish forums, and thus I know this guy, and yes, he is the biggest nit ever, playing on very soft sites, it's really nothing that impresses me about this except for his stamina to put in hands. He would get killed on tougher sites.

Even so, congratulations on your results of course, I'm really not taking that away from you, I'm just trying to explain that these thats are really, really non even close to optimal, and that you are winning from really bad players, not from decent players.

Got it?


[/ QUOTE ]

Being an average player killing fish > being a talented player peddling a small edge/winrate against decent players. Good table selection is good poker.