|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
If the board wasn't double paired, I'd like it. Otherwise he can't raise w/o AA or 33 (which if he's decent, he would have already made a move). I'd probably throw out a vb in the low 40s.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
$40 value bet seems better. If board weren't double paired, this would be hot. As it stands, there's really nothing he can pop you with here, so most of the time you get rewarded with a $25 call from AJo.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
probably just FPS. not many 3's or AA can show up here.
if he's a good reg, i really can't see what he's holding here except for 33, or KQs/some other strong FD. any strong ace and he's raising PF. any set and he has to be raising this flop/turn. any random 2p like A3 has to be raising this flop as well (especially since the donk folded and there is no villain to "slow play"). 33 Might make sense because he just boated on the turn, but still, super aggro players aren't likely to call 2 straight bets. i just hope he has KQs and put in a vb of 40ish. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
FWIW, villain called and showed ATo.
I think I like checkraising better even though in this particular case I'm not sure if he's betting or just taking his showdown value. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, villain called and showed ATo. I think I like checkraising better even though in this particular case I'm not sure if he's betting or just taking his showdown value. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe you should change his status from good reg to "reg". calling 3 bets w/ ATo doesn't exactly seem like a winning strategy, especially given the fact you bet into 5! players on the flop. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
If he's really a "good reg" then you must have been doing some crazy stuff earlier to make an image where he takes this line.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
I said he "seemed like a reasonable reg (20.98/9.07/4.67 over 3K hands) if somewhat LAGy."
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
I read "reasonable reg if somewhat lag" as slag pf, but plays reasonably post. You sure you didn't show him a 3 barrel bluff? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Fake blocking bet with the nuts
[ QUOTE ]
I said he "seemed like a reasonable reg (20.98/9.07/4.67 over 3K hands) if somewhat LAGy." [/ QUOTE ] his play in this hand was completely unreasonable... |
|
|