|
View Poll Results: Do you think this is unethical? | |||
Yes | 14 | 28.00% | |
No | 30 | 60.00% | |
results plz. | 6 | 12.00% | |
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
I think this is not possible
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
pretty sure i saw a NL10 graph with +2K$ over a ton of hands in one of those micro stake graph threads
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
unpossible
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
i ran about 20ptbb/100 over ~40k at nl5 but no stats or anything
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
The probability that this is photoshopped is like almost 100%.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
the guy will write a series of articles for a hungarian affil site. (Poker School II) he posted his NL10 stats to prove the possibilites in microstakes.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
[ QUOTE ]
i ran about 20ptbb/100 over ~40k at nl5 but no stats or anything [/ QUOTE ] 42ptbb/100 in 7k hands, .01/.02NL |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
nah, these are probably real. I've always thought playing every hand at nanostakes where they autostack off with second pair'd be profitable so this isn't a surprise.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 29 ptbb/100 over 64k hands (not my stats)
tell him to move up
|
|
|