#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No longer bluffing -- is that a bad thing?
Well maybe that was a slight exaggeration, im not really raising everything i was just trying to make a point that the only place that any kind of bluffing works at micros is preflop, where you can punish limpers.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No longer bluffing -- is that a bad thing?
These are great responses. I expected to get flamed out of the building on this.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No longer bluffing -- is that a bad thing?
[ QUOTE ]
Well maybe that was a slight exaggeration, im not really raising everything i was just trying to make a point that the only place that any kind of bluffing works at micros is preflop, where you can punish limpers. [/ QUOTE ] That's not true for me. I've found myself in more bad situations trying that strategy... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No longer bluffing -- is that a bad thing?
PP, from a game-theoretic point of view we can make a case that you don't need to start bluffing until you find that your opponents have adapted to your TAG strategy by always laying down second-best hands to your value bets. If you are having no trouble at all getting paid off when you have a set or overpair, for example, then you can rest assured that you don't need to be bluffing in this game.
|
|
|