Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-21-2007, 09:06 PM
Renton Renton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

[ QUOTE ]
I think it's a fold and not even close;

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate it when people say this about hands like this.

Saying its "not even close" by association means that bottom set would be a close decision, which obviously would be a lie.

This is the bottom of our calling range / top of our folding range, so by definition its as close as it gets.

If it is a fold, which i assume it is considering all of the opinions of good players in this thread point to folding, its a close one.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-21-2007, 09:13 PM
dtan05 dtan05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: whining in MSNL
Posts: 3,112
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

why on earth would KK play OOP in a 3bet pot with stacks this deep? I'm referring to UTG here.

I don't think MP flats KK here again, after what looks like a squeeze and a call by a pp of sorts. Isn't this basic handreading? Also, MP only has 100bbs, wtf is he trying to get tricky for?

Unless you're trying to get it all in vs MP? But I doubt he'll call with <set after you push over the top of MP's all in.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-21-2007, 09:15 PM
dtan05 dtan05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: whining in MSNL
Posts: 3,112
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

[ QUOTE ]
looks like JJ - KK from UTG and 55/77/JJ/spades from MP. With a generous distribution of spade draws we have at most 20% equity:
Hand 0: 20.581% 20.04% 00.54% 34922 946.50 { AhAs }
Hand 1: 17.728% 17.18% 00.54% 29949 946.50 { JJ+ }
Hand 2: 61.691% 61.69% 00.00% 107515 0.00 { JJ, 77, 55, KsQs, Ts9s, 9s8s, 6s5s }

We aren't getting 20% pot even if the other player calls as well. We get close if we get the rest of the other player's stack, but I think if we shove here we're only getting called by JJ.

Weird to fold AA in a reraised pot, but it is correct here.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-21-2007, 09:56 PM
RiverHebrew2 RiverHebrew2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,293
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

I make a PSRR pf. As played, I sorta like ur laydown, but I never personally make it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:54 PM
Janis N. Janis N. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 527
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think it's a fold and not even close;

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate it when people say this about hands like this.

Saying its "not even close" by association means that bottom set would be a close decision, which obviously would be a lie.

This is the bottom of our calling range / top of our folding range, so by definition its as close as it gets.

If it is a fold, which i assume it is considering all of the opinions of good players in this thread point to folding, its a close one.

[/ QUOTE ]You make a good point, I hadn't thought about it this way.

Here are the PokerStoves as I see their ranges, which would even indicate 55 is a fold.

So one of my senses (the explicit putting them on the range sense or the intuitive "what we do now?" sense) is totally off, as intuitively I want to snapfold AA while snapshove 55.

Board: 5h Js 7s
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 17.823% 17.82% 00.00% 33476 0.00 { AhAs }
Hand 1: 41.996% 42.00% 00.00% 78879 0.00 { QQ-JJ, 77, 55 }
Hand 2: 40.181% 40.18% 00.00% 75469 0.00 { QQ-JJ, 77, 55, AhJh, KsQs, Ts9s, 6s5s }

Board: 5h Js 7s
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 18.633% 18.63% 00.00% 66123 0.00 { 55 }
Hand 1: 42.576% 42.56% 00.02% 151038 54.00 { QQ-JJ, 77, 55 }
Hand 2: 38.792% 38.78% 00.02% 137610 54.00 { QQ-JJ, 77, 55, AhJh, KsQs, Ts9s, 6s5s }

What does everyone think of these ranges, I have them totally wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-22-2007, 03:39 AM
xcrack999 xcrack999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 410
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

I think you have to include KK in their ranges. That should make things closer, but still very very marginal.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:39 AM
Barrin6 Barrin6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 100k hands 5ptbb+ nl1/2 b4 nl2/4
Posts: 3,732
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

When I first read this thread, I was thinking that everyone who said fold was leveling. But as I read further down, I see people actually taking there responses seriously. So now I don't know if the people who said to fold is leveling or not.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:45 AM
FionnMac FionnMac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,922
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

i call here and i'm a nit
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:51 AM
Barrin6 Barrin6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 100k hands 5ptbb+ nl1/2 b4 nl2/4
Posts: 3,732
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

Just in case this isn't a level.

Folding is so bad here. You get in a re raised pot with a dream flop and AA, and now you want to fold? WTF
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:55 AM
FionnMac FionnMac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,922
Default Re: Big Laydown? Standart Laydown? Bad Laydown?

yeh i think this might be one of those threads where the first couple of ppl say fold and everyone else kinda blindly agrees (not criticizing anyone, iv done this myself too)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.