|
|
#61
09-20-2007, 01:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 200 - JTs
[ QUOTE ]
I have a hard time wrapping my head around checking this flop in position and then calling a bet from the villain on the turn. Are small PP and worse jacks really firing that often on the turn? I think you're much more likely to find yourself paying off better hands rather than inducing a bluff. With hands like this, I like to find out where I stand sooner rather than later. [/ QUOTE ] It's read-dependent. Plenty of LAGtards will fire ATC on the turn. 
|
|
#62
09-20-2007, 01:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 200 - JTs
[ QUOTE ]
no im not, but we have no idea of his bluffing frequencies. So it isn't a great idea to check to induce bluffs. [/ QUOTE ] You also have no idea of his preflop range and no idea of his calling or check-raising range when you bet this flop.
|
|
#63
09-20-2007, 02:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 200 - JTs
jay, I used to think your advice was bad [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. I have since changed my mind. I can only hope pineapple changes soon too, I <3'ed him in stt forums :x
|
|
#64
09-20-2007, 02:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 200 - JTs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] no im not, but we have no idea of his bluffing frequencies. So it isn't a great idea to check to induce bluffs. [/ QUOTE ] You also have no idea of his preflop range and no idea of his calling or check-raising range when you bet this flop. [/ QUOTE ] we are checking to induce bluffs, so w/o any idea of his bluffing frequency it seems bad. we arent betting to induce a c/r, it's so unlilkely that his calling range will change dramatically on the turn too.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
